Even the extremely biased commentators gave it to Dirrell

[PhonzoXD]

now u know.

[Doctor_Tenma]

They were very biased. Froch would land a jab and they'd say, "Nice jab!", I'm like WTF has Dirrell been doing the whole fight?

[Freddy Krueger]

Yeah, someone posted that on another forum. They said that the british announce team even gave it to dirrell. HAHAHA, froch is a fraud and even the british announcers had him losing.

[Crazylegs77]

now u know.

well the its settled.

[PhonzoXD]

all i know is that during the pre fight, the commentators kept saying how nerveous Dirrell looked, then after about 5 rounds they changed their tune.

[karrapato]

Could go either way, Dirrel was starting the round very well and Froch was closing all the rounds with his pressure.

Was not a robbery, come on.

But Dirrel proved to be a good kid. He may be trouble for other contenders in this tournament.

[Dynamite Kid]

now u know.

And that was with a point taken

[Pullcounter]

Could go either way, Dirrel was starting the round very well and Froch was closing all the rounds with his pressure.

Was not a robbery, come on.

But Dirrel proved to be a good kid. He may be trouble for other contenders in this tournament.

you don't win rounds w/ pressure, you win rounds w/ punching and dirrell landed the cleaner and more punches.

it was a robbery

dirrell was green and he proved he beat froch.

now u know.

yep.. they know that dirrell exposed froch as a slow unskilled brawler.

[The Hammer]

Both the American and UK commentators said it was a close fight that could have gone either way.

Steve Bunce scored it 115-112 for Froch.

[Dynamite Kid]

Both the American and UK commentators said it was a close fight that could have gone either way.

Steve Bunce scored it 115-112 for Froch.

Oh well thats it, they dont come any more objective than Bunce do they?