Froch won no more then 4 rounds.

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • !! Shawn
    !! Shown
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 9810
    • 670
    • 724
    • 31,455

    #21
    Originally posted by Dominicano Soy!
    Froch landed no more then 3-4 solid shots the whole fight.
    Was going to say, not only did he only win 3 or 4 rounds, he only landed 3 or 4 punches the entire fight. How he thinks he wont a fight without hitting Dirrell, when Dirrell was bombing him flush in the face is beyond me.

    Comment

    • Doctor_Tenma
      Monster
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Apr 2009
      • 33313
      • 1,327
      • 1,249
      • 58,127

      #22
      Originally posted by Dynamite Kid
      I agree.

      I scored the fight on the back of my hand lol

      What i did was if the round was close i put a C underneath it, if i was being kind to either man i put a S underneath it for sympathy and all the rounds i gave Froch had a K(kind) and an S ( sympathy)
      LMAO! That is a funny and cool way to score a fight. When I saw that the round was even, I was like well...Froch is the aggressor, Froch round. Again, I believe I gave him a round I shouldn't have. I'm thinking 9 to 3.

      Comment

      • !! Shawn
        !! Shown
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 9810
        • 670
        • 724
        • 31,455

        #23
        Originally posted by letsgobrady
        froch landed some good shots in the clinch and probably more punches than you are all givin him credit for but most of that was dirrells fault, dirrell was the one initiating the clinch the majority of the time, yea dirrell was looking good when he was out boxing froch but he also looked horrible when he was wrestling with froch which to me is what made this fight close it was so close that i just stoped keepin track of the rounds because i found myself scoring a couple of rounds a draw
        The only problem was 90% of them were illegal.

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP