-
-
My camera was being a ***** whore for a moment so I didn't get the first four...
Hope you guys appreciate these last five...
Its when the action picked up anyway... -
Seems to be quite a bit of bitching going on about the decision...
Dirrell ran too much, end of story...
He wasn't the aggresor at any point in the fight really...
He seemed terrified of the idea of getting hit...
Does he know he's a boxer? LMFAO.Comment
-
As I said Dirrell needed to fight rounds 1 - 10 like he did 11 and 12; he boxed beautifully in those.Comment
-
Yeah, he finally shook the boogey men off in that round and didn't seem so scared of the return fire. In all of the early rounds all he did was jump in, hold, jump in, hold. I don't see how any one can give him rounds where he isn't getting anything done but holding and landing nothing.Comment
-
Its pretty clear that Froch won.
Dirrell didn't do anything that would make me give him the fight...Comment
-
Ummmm, and what did Froch do? Did he land the most clean effective punches? No. Did he make his opponent look foolish by missing shots? No. Was Dirrell ever hurt? No Did Dirrell initiate the dirty tactics? No.Originally posted by [ - _ - ] View Post
Explain to me what he did to win? Every fighters style is not to trade shots and when they did Dirrell still beat him to the punch....?Comment
-
I ask you a better question...
What did Dirrell do?Comment
-
Hmm cleaner jabs, he actually dodged punches unlike Froch, had Froch HURT(didnt know u can run and hurt someone at the same time). Overall outboxed him. Now your turn, What Did Froch Do? Run into Punches aggressively? LOLOriginally posted by [ - _ - ] View PostComment
-
Thanks you, because it is clear that the questions I asked were all the things Dirrell did. Being delusional is a serious disease now days.Originally posted by killacash View PostComment
Tweet
[VIDEO] Rounds 5 through 12 of Dirrell VS Froch
Comment