andre dirrell is a shameless coward

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • CiganoBoxer
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Sep 2008
    • 2286
    • 566
    • 692
    • 8,802

    #21
    i am from the UK but i thought Dirrel won that fight....but then he was very negative at times....and if your gonna win a world title you've got to win it big....he was trying to steal it at times...he said he didn't know why the ref took a point but he was like a sailor holding on to a mast at times....you cant win a title like in the eyes of judges!
    That being said IMO Dirrel won that fight

    Comment

    • BoxingChaos
      Ambiguous
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • May 2009
      • 4596
      • 311
      • 272
      • 11,182

      #22
      Originally posted by TRUE WARRIOR!!!
      you are telling me this guy is a top 6 super middleweight??? what a joke!!!! this guy runs all day holds like a ***** when froch gets near him and gets on his knees to avoid punches inside. then he has the nerve to complain!!!! typical american cowardly fighter. what a disgrace to boxing.
      I am American but I ashamed of that running woman Dirrell. At least Taylor came to fight.

      Comment

      • cyutetrick
        Interim Champion
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Mar 2009
        • 811
        • 12
        • 0
        • 7,196

        #23
        yea i actually thought Dirrell won by 2 points. I see how you can say the dicision was a little home gromed but i mean you really have to decisively beat the champion. I really hope the promoters overlook this fight and rethink placing fighters at their home turf. Idk Froch was just so sloppy this fight if Kessler looks as good as i have seen him before i dont see him beating kessler. Idk Im very sure Dirrell won but you know its not as controversial of a decision as we have seen in other fights.

        Comment

        • Dirt McGirt
          Waddaboutchee
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Aug 2009
          • 158
          • 7
          • 6
          • 6,192

          #24
          Man, I'm sorry, but for me that was Dirrell's fight.

          Held, ran, complained...... but still showed far more boxing ability, landed more clean punches, more power punches, showed great reflexes, and as much as I wanted Froch to win, i just can't see what he actually did to deserve it.

          I usually hate fighters running and holding, and I really wanted the Europeans to win and show America who the best fighters are, but apart from a few early frustrating rounds I was really impressed with Dirrell, especially the last few rounds.

          I'm not saying it was a robbery or anything, but as an unbiased boxing fan I thought Dirrell took the fight by 2/3 rounds.

          Comment

          • cyutetrick
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Mar 2009
            • 811
            • 12
            • 0
            • 7,196

            #25
            Originally posted by Mrpedigree
            i am from the UK but i thought Dirrel won that fight....but then he was very negative at times....and if your gonna win a world title you've got to win it big....he was trying to steal it at times...he said he didn't know why the ref took a point but he was like a sailor holding on to a mast at times....you cant win a title like in the eyes of judges!
            That being said IMO Dirrel won that fight
            Co-sign bro. dirrell cant complain because he needs to win big but i think he won. Then again dude this is a tournament, whoever being champion or not shouldnt really be relevant because at the end of the tourny doesnt the winner take all belts?

            Comment

            • larss7on
              Up and Comer
              Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
              • Nov 2008
              • 55
              • 0
              • 0
              • 6,207

              #26
              Originally posted by Dirt McGirt
              Man, I'm sorry, but for me that was Dirrell's fight.

              Held, ran, complained...... but still showed far more boxing ability, landed more clean punches, more power punches, showed great reflexes, and as much as I wanted Froch to win, i just can't see what he actually did to deserve it.

              I usually hate fighters running and holding, and I really wanted the Europeans to win and show America who the best fighters are, but apart from a few early frustrating rounds I was really impressed with Dirrell, especially the last few rounds.

              I'm not saying it was a robbery or anything, but as an unbiased boxing fan I thought Dirrell took the fight by 2/3 rounds.
              Agreed Completely!

              Comment

              • Crazylegs77
                null and void
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Jan 2008
                • 13101
                • 445
                • 296
                • 21,573

                #27
                Originally posted by TRUE WARRIOR!!!
                you are telling me this guy is a top 6 super middleweight??? what a joke!!!! this guy runs all day holds like a ***** when froch gets near him and gets on his knees to avoid punches inside. then he has the nerve to complain!!!! typical american cowardly fighter. what a disgrace to boxing.
                Damn not a good performance to dedicate to the troops, they deserve better.

                Comment

                • cyutetrick
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 811
                  • 12
                  • 0
                  • 7,196

                  #28
                  HEy you guys got to admit though this fight was much more entertaining than the Abraham Taylor fight. I really like Taylor or at least to say the old Taylor, but wow Abraham impressed the heck out of me. It was to one-sided after the 5th round. I think he was the better of the 4 fighters who fought tonight.

                  Comment

                  • Pullcounter
                    no guts no glory
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jan 2004
                    • 42582
                    • 549
                    • 191
                    • 49,739

                    #29
                    Originally posted by Mrpedigree
                    i am from the UK but i thought Dirrel won that fight....but then he was very negative at times....and if your gonna win a world title you've got to win it big....he was trying to steal it at times...he said he didn't know why the ref took a point but he was like a sailor holding on to a mast at times....you cant win a title like in the eyes of judges!
                    That being said IMO Dirrel won that fight
                    you can't win a fight if you can't land punches... dirrell landed the cleanest and most effective punches

                    Originally posted by BoxingChaos
                    I am American but I ashamed of that running woman Dirrell. At least Taylor came to fight.
                    yes, dirrel ran, clinched, and complained too much... but he won the fight.

                    Comment

                    • shabs
                      Banned
                      • Feb 2009
                      • 292
                      • 5
                      • 0
                      • 347

                      #30
                      super 6 world boxing FIX

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP