Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Its time to drop Canelo Alvarez from pound-for-pound lists

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • TheProudLunatic
    replied
    I guess the mob hasn't picked a P4P King

    Leave a comment:


  • MulaKO
    replied
    Originally posted by THC View Post
    He has a solid resume and it's a long one. Arguably he's still an elite fighter and as the most popular athlete in the sport, whatever he earns, he deserves. But since being dominated by Bivol, his performances have consistently failed to engage viewers seeking compelling matchups. So only his ardent followers would now consider him as #1 p4p. I have no problem with his cherry picking for the best pay. Other boxers do it all the time. e.g. Tank Davis. But let's not insult fans of the sport by declaring yourself the best if your MO going forward is to ignore the best challengers in your weight division, just because the sanctioning bodies (aside from IBF) don't have the backbone to enforce their mandos in order to pocket their belt fees. Weak sauce.
    IBF is not any better
    No need to look any further than yesterday’s fight : Chisora vs Wallin eliminator for the top spot
    If that isn’t a ridiculously ignorant move by them , I don’t know what is

    Leave a comment:


  • Bullboi007
    replied
    Who cares .I realized it was all hype since he lost to ERISLANDY LARA

    Leave a comment:


  • THC
    replied
    He has a solid resume and it's a long one. Arguably he's still an elite fighter and as the most popular athlete in the sport, whatever he earns, he deserves. But since being dominated by Bivol, his performances have consistently failed to engage viewers seeking compelling matchups. So only his ardent followers would now consider him as #1 p4p. I have no problem with his cherry picking for the best pay. Other boxers do it all the time. e.g. Tank Davis. But let's not insult fans of the sport by declaring yourself the best if your MO going forward is to ignore the best challengers in your weight division, just because the sanctioning bodies (aside from IBF) don't have the backbone to enforce their mandos in order to pocket their belt fees. Weak sauce.

    Leave a comment:


  • MulaKO
    replied
    Originally posted by Pacific Coast Boxing View Post

    By this criteria and all others in this forum who are clearly looking at this through an anti-Canelo lens, the P4P list would essentially be non-existent. Yes, one of the criteria of making the P4P list should be viable opponents, but not every single fight will qualify as "fighting the best". Given the landscape in boxing, you can make make a strong case that Canelo in fact is one of perhaps only 3 - 5 fighters that would remain on the list if the most significant component of making the P4P list was quality opponents. Punches in bunches gentlemen!!
    Lmfao
    Yeah wtv this guy said

    Leave a comment:


  • Pacific Coast Boxing
    replied
    Originally posted by Oracle01 View Post

    Another triggered canelita. The article was spot on. Canelo has not had a p4p performance since the Plant fight over 3 years ago. He was looked mediocre the last 6 fights despite 5 of them being C level fighters. He can't even look impressive vs bums like Berlanga and Mungia. What Canelo has done over the last 10 years, because p4p is about CURRENT ability not 10 years ago. You are exactly what's wrong with boxing, along with Canelo.
    By this criteria and all others in this forum who are clearly looking at this through an anti-Canelo lens, the P4P list would essentially be non-existent. Yes, one of the criteria of making the P4P list should be viable opponents, but not every single fight will qualify as "fighting the best". Given the landscape in boxing, you can make make a strong case that Canelo in fact is one of perhaps only 3 - 5 fighters that would remain on the list if the most significant component of making the P4P list was quality opponents. Punches in bunches gentlemen!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Sheikh
    replied
    I hope he retires. He is so overrated and protected.
    Elastic Recoilz Elastic Recoilz likes this.

    Leave a comment:


  • MulaKO
    replied
    Originally posted by Coreytrevor12 View Post

    10-2 is more realistic than 5-7 in my opinion. I think 9-3 or 8-4 is a more fair assessment. Bivol schooled him. It wasn't that competitive
    He says who cares about the list but yet still here trying to justify it ; figures lol

    7/5 only in his delusional mind

    Leave a comment:


  • SkinG209
    replied
    Originally posted by AKAcronym View Post

    Found the child in the comments.
    I’m here to talk boxing and keep it real with my unbiased opinions and facts! I definitely won’t take any disrespect tho *****!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • AKAcronym
    replied
    Originally posted by SkinG209

    Make sure your mom wipes her mouth before you guys call my family! I will be embarrassed if she don’t swallow like a good whore!!!
    Found the child in the comments.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X
TOP