Comments Thread For: ?Disappointed? Sulaiman vows judging review after horrible decision in Pradabsri-Canizales fight

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • trippleupper
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • May 2008
    • 913
    • 207
    • 94
    • 9,924

    #11
    Originally posted by wildman
    As usual, nothing will come from this "investigation". These crooked judges will continue to be assigned fights.
    If it results in increased awareness of what happens when a boxer travels to Thailand for a world title fight, that's something.

    Comment

    • Nash out
      BoxingScene Hall of Fame
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Nov 2018
      • 5943
      • 2,127
      • 1,799
      • 19,416

      #12
      Originally posted by trippleupper

      Just because you don't know doesn't mean nobody does
      Thank you for your comment. Nash out - His Majesty

      Comment

      • El_Mero
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • May 2019
        • 7626
        • 3,149
        • 11,224
        • 31,316

        #13
        Fcuk that puto Sulaiman and Gilberto too. Crooked mofos

        Comment

        • trippleupper
          Interim Champion
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • May 2008
          • 913
          • 207
          • 94
          • 9,924

          #14
          Originally posted by Nash out

          Thank you for your comment. Nash out - His Majesty
          Thank you for your reply!

          Comment

          • PeanutRay
            Amateur
            Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
            • Oct 2021
            • 24
            • 8
            • 17
            • 0

            #15
            Why didn't the WBC investigate bad decisions years ago? Chavez vs. Whitaker draw in Texas; Ramirez over Whitaker in France. Where was the WBC when we needed them? Seems they do nothing when Mexican fighter gets a gift, but GEEZ look what happens when an Hispanic fighter loses.
            Last edited by PeanutRay; 12-27-2024, 11:43 AM.

            Comment

            • mjh1969
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Oct 2017
              • 938
              • 552
              • 412
              • 10,013

              #16
              Bad decisions are a part of boxing history. Chavez vs Taylor, Ali vs Norton 3, Holyfield vs Lewis 1, Canelo vs GGG 1, etc. No one seems to do anything about it. Investigations are held but that is the extent of them. Maybe having an independent judge on the side to reverse bad decisions could make a difference. There is so much technology out that could help make boxing less corrupt when it comes to bad decisions. Using an online poll helps too.

              Comment

              • Corelone
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Sep 2009
                • 13342
                • 1,784
                • 856
                • 66,332

                #17
                Originally posted by PeanutRay
                Why didn't the WBC investigate bad decisions years ago? Chavez vs. Whitaker draw in Texas; Ramirez over Whitaker in France. Where was the WBC when we needed them? Seems they do nothing when Mexican fighter gets a gift, but GEEZ look what happens when an Hispanic fighter loses.
                Peewee? He was spastic looking, always clowning, ugly winning. You won't get much sympathy there.

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP