Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Tyson Vs Klitscko! WHO WINS

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by boxernyc
    You're right Tyson is still dangerous. Just not in the boxing sense versus Vitali.

    I voted for Vitali. I think he would easily dominate Mike who doesn't have the strengths (plus with his knee problems he would have to be well rehabilitated for it not to act up) he had at his prime to be able to deal with such a huge size disparity. Back in the day I would have said it would be a good fight and hard to call but I would give Mike the nod for his sheer power and agression. But I think prime Tyson versus prime (I guess that is now) Vitali is a hard one to call. I am not a huge Vitali fan (he is akward as hell but finds a way to get the job done) but he has a rock solid chin and can keep smaller opponents at bay pretty well.
    agree 100% with your opinions, can`t realy add anything, you said it all actually!

    Comment


    • #12
      Voted for VK, Tyson's strength wouldn't seem like much against an opponent as large as VK. Tyson would just bob and weave, about half scared of what would await him when he lunges in, and when he does, he gets a one-two, and maybe a half hook, half uppercut before being tied up. I say it ends well before the 8th round, as VK watched the Douglas and Lewis fights and knows all too well how easy it is for someone his size to land on Mike without being hit.

      Comment


      • #13
        This is a major mismatch. Unless Tyson hits Vitali with a perfect hook then Mike is ****ed. I'd say Vitali in 5 or 6.

        Comment


        • #14
          I am a fan of vintage Tyson, he seemed immortal in the 80's. It was awesome to watch him take over, then dominate the heavyweight division. Having said that, the division is different now and so is Tyson.

          Heck, I think Wladimir could beat today's Tyson within two rounds.

          Comment


          • #15
            tYSON CAN still do it. I voted for him.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by Torino
              I am a fan of vintage Tyson, he seemed immortal in the 80's. It was awesome to watch him take over, then dominate the heavyweight division. Having said that, the division is different now and so is Tyson.

              Heck, I think Wladimir could beat today's Tyson within two rounds.
              Two rounds bro? No I don't think so. Wladimir is a little too slow for Mike. I think.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by manila_assasin
                Two rounds bro? No I don't think so. Wladimir is a little too slow for Mike. I think.
                I disagree. He has the fastest hands in the heavyweight division, as well as posseses boxer/puncher skills. Group that with his size and you have a potential mismatch favoring the steel hammer buddy.

                I love to make fun of Wlad, but it is undue.
                He is a Heavyweight Wrecking Ball. Chin may be shaky, but I get frustrated when I hear people write his heart and determination off. He rises from the canvas, and keeps on landing blows. What more can you ask of him as a slugger? someone please enlighten me.



                Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!
                Last edited by Run; 03-21-2005, 03:41 PM.

                Comment


                • #18
                  I voted for Tyson. I just can't accept that he is washed up just yet. Tyson should follow the Foreman model.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Klitchko by KO, 3rd round.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Tyson/Wlad is a different story. Wlad would have to land the knockout blow first, otherwise he's ****ed if Tyson hits him.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP