Ya'll complicate P4P way too much. The original idea was and still is supposed to be that if the fighters were all the same size , who would win in a fight between them. Everyone wants to add criteria to justify their picks when it's just not that complicated.
I must say, in reading through this thread I was thinking the exact same thing.
Oh please. It was all in the execution, a masterclass in feints, positioning, timing and technical nuance. Lomachenko knew he was bigger so, in order for the win to have meaning, he deliberately handicapped himself by electing not to use that advantage at all. He sat down on nothing. Just completely out-finessed his rival master technician. Same result if Loma was a 122lb fighter. And again, in real proportional terms, there was less of a size difference than we saw in the Fury-Wilder fights.
Comment