How do you rate P4P fighters?
P4P used to be about who can beat who regardless of weight. Now it seems to come down to "what have you done for me lately". If a fighter beats another top fighter, then all of a sudden without question he is moved up in the rankings.
Some rate Morales above Mayweather because of what Morales has done "lately", but do they think Morales could beat Mayweather at the same weight?
I just want to know what your criteria is?
Is it what it was originally intended for? A question of whether a fighter can beat the fighters below him based on skills regardless of weight?
Is it what the fighter has done lately in terms of a big win or two vs another top fighter?
etc?
P4P used to be about who can beat who regardless of weight. Now it seems to come down to "what have you done for me lately". If a fighter beats another top fighter, then all of a sudden without question he is moved up in the rankings.
Some rate Morales above Mayweather because of what Morales has done "lately", but do they think Morales could beat Mayweather at the same weight?
I just want to know what your criteria is?
Is it what it was originally intended for? A question of whether a fighter can beat the fighters below him based on skills regardless of weight?
Is it what the fighter has done lately in terms of a big win or two vs another top fighter?
etc?
to your mom..
Comment