Tweet
1. A fight review panel could be set up to assess each fight in detail and ensure that it's scored fairly, even if the final decision opposes the decision by the judges on the night of the fight. The final announcement could be made a week after each fight in a review show. This might help to eradicate the expectation which many have that home fighters will receive favorable decisions.
2. If a point was deducted or a knock-down scored, specific slow motion replay could be presented to the referee between rounds to confirm the validity of his decision. The technology has been there for some time, why isn't it implemented?
Should the Super 6 tournament mandate a new policy to ensure the fights are judged fairly? By doing so they may set a new precedent in boxing and help to make unfair decisions a thing of the past. Within the confines of this tournament I think there is that freedom to enact a new approach.
What other methods do you think could be used to make sure the best man actually wins?
2. If a point was deducted or a knock-down scored, specific slow motion replay could be presented to the referee between rounds to confirm the validity of his decision. The technology has been there for some time, why isn't it implemented?
Should the Super 6 tournament mandate a new policy to ensure the fights are judged fairly? By doing so they may set a new precedent in boxing and help to make unfair decisions a thing of the past. Within the confines of this tournament I think there is that freedom to enact a new approach.
What other methods do you think could be used to make sure the best man actually wins?