You Must Take The Win From The A-Side
Collapse
-
-
When you actually grow up and learn something, then talk. It's in the literal rules, which you clearly don't know, not to mention being historical fact. Draws are rare, yes. One just happened on Saturday. And the rules need to explain what happens in that case.
There's thousands of examples of challengers winning belts on split decisions. Just in the past 6 months, you've had Usyk as B-side beating Fury on a split decision, Nick Ball beating Ray Ford on a split decision, Conceicao beating O'shaquie Foster on a split decision, and just Saturday, Jose Valenzuela beating Isaac Cruz on a split decision, etc. That happens ALL THE TIME.
It's very obvious you don't YDKSAB. To repeat, at least do your research before spreading these asinine takes. You are 100% factually and historically wrong.
The premise of the thread is judging favoritism goes towards the a-side rather than the champ.
I see reading comprehension is a genetic weakness of yours. You are going to struggle to learn anything and grow up until this issue is fixed
Don’t be that naive old foolComment
-
A fair scorecard is a draw in my opinion. Madrimov keeps the belt,and the fight gets run back. The 116-112 was absolute nonsense. But when you have a guy pouring millions upon millions into boxing,and his trousers are soaking wet to see canelo vs Crawford,there's no way that Madrimov was keeping that belt.Comment
Comment