All of this ridiculous "well she lost to other women, so it isn't a big deal obviously."
If the female in question is producing male levels of test because of birth defect.....and it certainly appears so when looking at her.....then the point is, she has a distinct advantage in punching power. Maybe she isn't a great boxer and wasn't able to land big shots on some opponents. But if she DOES land big shots on any female boxer, it is an unfair advantage, and dangerous. I mean I could go fight some female boxers and a few of them might outbox me. But if I land a good one on their chin, I am a strong guy. That is called a man assaulting a woman.
How is that not obvious and just easy to see to anyone with half a brain? How are people defending this ****? It boggles the mind.
If the female in question is producing male levels of test because of birth defect.....and it certainly appears so when looking at her.....then the point is, she has a distinct advantage in punching power. Maybe she isn't a great boxer and wasn't able to land big shots on some opponents. But if she DOES land big shots on any female boxer, it is an unfair advantage, and dangerous. I mean I could go fight some female boxers and a few of them might outbox me. But if I land a good one on their chin, I am a strong guy. That is called a man assaulting a woman.
How is that not obvious and just easy to see to anyone with half a brain? How are people defending this ****? It boggles the mind.
Comment