Comments Thread For: 'It's now or never' for Errol Spence Jr.
Collapse
-
-
I stand corrected. Brook was in his prime before he fought GGG. He should have never taken that fight. And then fighting Spence next, hurt his career.Comment
-
Nah Brook was better than Porter he took his title from him in Vegas. Spence stopping Brook in England when they were both in their primes was legendary. By the time he fought Porter he had declined due to his lifestyle and Porter had lost to Brook thurman and was given a more than generous decision against Ugas. The Spence that had fought Brook would’ve punished Porter. He barely eeked out a decision. IMO he never really caught the magic of the Brook fight again in his career…the Crawford fight was his chance but he clearly doesn’t have it anymore. I think he kind of knows that now.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
I lost respect for Spence when he tried to freeze Crawford out before they fought....AND then again this whole time after they fought. Coward and spiteful stuff.
I have tremendous respect for him when he beat Brooks and Porter. Shame what money and ego does to a person.Comment
-
It's "now or never"?
I doubt there's a "never" part. He has to come back and continue making money. He still has to settle his money issues with his ex-trainer. Spencer is getting tight with money. No wonder he was complaining about the cost of sanctioning fees in his presscon with Crawford.Comment
Comment