what makes a boxer?,what makes a champion?what makes a legend?

[Chuckguy]

Its sad that Larry cant even m,ake a thread without being gang******
hahaha
its all good larry
maybe next time homie

[joartcc5]

Your frame of reference for calling another man a coward is what? What act have you done that's braver than deciding to switch up your usual at the Waffle House, or rubing one out with your left hand instead of your right?

Cowards prefer other cowards.

It's just how the way things are.

Some cultures admire cowards. Like the gayweather stans.

Of course majority of people still prefer dignified champs.

And gayweather is a coward. That's a fact.

His words says it.

His actions validate it.

And if you prefer cowards over dignified champs... then that's ur freakin problem.

Of course I will continue to use u as a tool.

[RightCross94]

Talent, good management and above all hard, hard work. 10-15, sometimes even twenty years before anyone knows who he is, the next great fighter is in the gym sparring, training, fighting 3 round fights for no money and slowly progressing.

[joartcc5]

Talent, good management and above all hard, hard work. 10-15, sometimes even twenty years before anyone knows who he is, the next great fighter is in the gym sparring, training, fighting 3 round fights for no money and slowly progressing.

A great fighter fights the best and ducks nobody.

Talent has nothing to do with it ignoramus.

Of course gayweather can never be considered great as he's a coward.

Cowards and greats doesn't mix.

[lowki]

I think we can all agree that pac is the ****......not manny 2pac.............**** floyd.

[jrosales13]

A great fighter fights the best and ducks nobody.

Talent has nothing to do with it ignoramus.

Of course gayweather can never be considered great as he's a coward.

Cowards and greats doesn't mix.

I think you need talent to become a legend. Can you name me one legendary fighter who has no talent?

[civicvx]

I guess that requirement disqualifies Froid then. If he ever fights an elite ww I'll reconsider.

If that is ture than Fraud Gayweather is out.

[joartcc5]

I think you need talent to become a legend. Can you name me one legendary fighter who has no talent?

Talent is relative, and subjective to one's description.

What makes a true great is fighting other greats. Not ducking them.

It's an insult to say ur better than Robinson yet u refuses to fight a guy coz he's ur basketball buddy.

Pathetic cowards.

[alexpz]

I think you need talent to become a legend. Can you name me one legendary fighter who has no talent?

Yeah I do agree that you need talent to be a legend. But how can you be a legend if you don't use your talent wisely.

[jrosales13]

Talent is relative, and subjective to one's description.

What makes a true great is fighting other greats. Not ducking them.

It's an insult to say ur better than Robinson yet u refuses to fight a guy coz he's ur basketball buddy.

Pathetic cowards.

Ok I see you talking about Floyd. But, what is your description of a talented fighter? And, name all the legendary fighters you can. And, tell which one did not have talent. Floyd is not a legend I agree. But, don't say you don't need talent to become a legend. Cuz in reality you can not become legendary without talent.