carl froch is a very skillful fighter=fact...

**thewinfella** · 10-13-2009, 12:26 PM

Originally posted by slimshandy69

Heres some facts that are undebatable.

1)froch is the first englishmen to win a medel at the world amature championships..you CANNOT be unskillful and have a very good amature pedigree.Its purely on skill, with the scoring sysem and the prtective head guards, its all about out scoring opponents..froch has a great record amature..where he got robbed in alot of his fights he lost as well.

2)He beat pascal with no debate. Pascal is a entrmely elusive fighter with a good chin and decent power. Froch imo beat him comfortably. Great fight but it was no debate, he won.

3) the jermane taylor myth. On my score card froch was one round down goin into the 12th. Primetime boxing had it evens goin into the 12th and the biased american judges had it a split ecision goin into the 12th, and we all know that the 12th round was watching jermaine taylor being bounced around the ring. Jermane yaylor is brilliant brilliant fighter who will school athor abraham..

FROCH IS VERY SKILLFUL, END OF...

Standby for a **** storm my friend !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

**Bushidō** · 10-13-2009, 12:27 PM

Originally posted by slimshandy69

Heres some facts that are undebatable.

1)froch is the first englishmen to win a medel at the world amature championships..you CANNOT be unskillful and have a very good amature pedigree.Its purely on skill, with the scoring sysem and the prtective head guards, its all about out scoring opponents..froch has a great record amature..where he got robbed in alot of his fights he lost as well.

2)He beat pascal with no debate. Pascal is a entrmely elusive fighter with a good chin and decent power. Froch imo beat him comfortably. Great fight but it was no debate, he won.

3) the jermane taylor myth. On my score card froch was one round down goin into the 12th. Primetime boxing had it evens goin into the 12th and the biased american judges had it a split ecision goin into the 12th, and we all know that the 12th round was watching jermaine taylor being bounced around the ring. Jermane yaylor is brilliant brilliant fighter who will school athor abraham..

FROCH IS VERY SKILLFUL, END OF...

Froch has stamina/chin/power. He keeps his hands so low and neglects his defense.

**Shadows** · 10-13-2009, 12:31 PM

Originally posted by slimshandy69

Heres some facts that are undebatable.

1)froch is the first englishmen to win a medel at the world amature championships..you CANNOT be unskillful and have a very good amature pedigree.Its purely on skill, with the scoring sysem and the prtective head guards, its all about out scoring opponents..froch has a great record amature..where he got robbed in alot of his fights he lost as well.

2)He beat pascal with no debate. Pascal is a entrmely elusive fighter with a good chin and decent power. Froch imo beat him comfortably. Great fight but it was no debate, he won.

3) the jermane taylor myth. On my score card froch was one round down goin into the 12th. Primetime boxing had it evens goin into the 12th and the biased american judges had it a split ecision goin into the 12th, and we all know that the 12th round was watching jermaine taylor being bounced around the ring. Jermane yaylor is brilliant brilliant fighter who will school athor abraham..

FROCH IS VERY SKILLFUL, END OF...

The judges weren't American. They were from Japan, Mexico, and Canada.

The only scores given that had Froch up, if I remember correctly, was an unofficial press row scorer from England and Woodburn.

**The Noose** · 10-13-2009, 12:32 PM

Taylor is a 'brilliant brilliant' fighter?

Yet was beaten twice by Pavlik.

Froch is decent, maybe the best of a bad bunch.

**Tmann400** · 10-13-2009, 12:33 PM

froch has good timing and controls range well with his jab. but it is WAY to easy to get through on him, and he doesnt even try to roll with the punches, he takes them flush which is damaging to your career over time. i mean in just his last two fights he has eaten around 700 or 800 big flush shots. and ive seen alot of his older fights. and in his fight with brian magee he was eating ****loads of punches. he is to easy to hit. id say he will only be a force in the super middleweight division for maybe another 2 years before his punch resistance goes.

**lparm** · 10-13-2009, 12:33 PM

Originally posted by Shadows

The judges weren't American. They were from Japan, Mexico, and Canada.

The only scores given that had Froch up, if I remember correctly, was an unofficial press row scorer from England and Woodburn.

True story.

Froch was losing badly.

**thewinfella** · 10-13-2009, 12:34 PM

Originally posted by Shadows

The judges weren't American. They were from Japan, Mexico, and Canada.

The only scores given that had Froch up, if I remember correctly, was an unofficial press row scorer from England.

I strongly disagree with this post and im suprised the American contingent havent already ripped it to shreds !!!!!

But you remember Incorrectly buddy :

http://www.boxrec.com/list_bouts.php...7570&cat=boxer

As the man says it was a SD heading into 12 .

**Chr0nic** · 10-13-2009, 12:35 PM

Originally posted by Bob Anomaly

Taylor is a 'brilliant brilliant' fighter?

Yet was beaten twice by Pavlik.

Froch is decent, maybe the best of a bad bunch.

taylors needs to realise that footwork is essential against these robotic punchers
taylor does good but as seen from both the pavlik fights and the fight with froch he takes alot of punishment even if he's sweeping the rounds, and the guy just does'nt(or did'nt, dont know, maybe eating healthy has given him some stamina) have stamina

**Tom_Tocca** · 10-13-2009, 12:35 PM

Does getting punched into da face due to poor imitation of RJJ count as a skill?

carl froch is a very skillful fighter=fact...