Both are strong run right through you guys, forget the plaster issue Margarito wasn't that bad, he had good punchin angles and a great chin, better then Frochs in my opinion. So vote.
Who is the better fighter? Froch or Margarito
Collapse
-
Froch. He has enough power to make up for his lack of defense. Margarito kind of just wears you down but doesn't have one punch power. If you have good stamina you can beat Margarito and thats why he has a bunch of losses on his record alreadyComment
-
Froch is much more durable than Margarito. If you are looking at chin, Forch has one of teh toughest in the sport. Against Jermain Taylor, Forch demonstrated how iron his chin is.
Compared that to Margarito's chin that got pounced by Mosley.Comment
-
-
-
Actually I think Froch doesn't have a good chin. First Pascal was hurting him all 12 rounds and Pascal is a moderate puncher at best, second Taylor knocked him down and hurt him. Margarito rarely got hurt and dropped in back to back fights, that is my reason for picking Margarito.Comment
-
I don't think Pascal hurt him, like Taylor did in the 8th, but IMO he did stun him a few times.Actually I think Froch doesn't have a good chin. First Pascal was hurting him all 12 rounds and Pascal is a moderate puncher at best, second Taylor knocked him down and hurt him. Margarito rarely got hurt and dropped in back to back fights, that is my reason for picking Margarito.
It does get overrated by some, but he's still got a good one. If you wanna see a concrete chin, watch Andrade v. Kessler.Comment
Comment