Comments Thread For: Richardson Hitchins Takes a Tight, Debatable UD Over Gustavo Lemos

[Sid-Knee]

Robbing Usyk is a whole lot different than robbing Gustavo Lemos or Delphine Person, wouldn't you say? Usyk has Olympic pedigree at the highest level, as well as respect and acclaim globally.

Golovkin was a big name but they still ripped him off. Lewis dominated Holyfield even though he was a champion who had Olympic pedigree.

Stop digging. You know the hole only becomes bigger for you.

[Sid-Knee]

Sooo based on your logic
I guess it was easier to rob the famous Champion Manny Paq against Tim Bradley or Champ De la Hoya against Felix Trinidad than Olympic pedigree Usyk
Lol

Rob is here to make a fool of himself and no more than that. But it is fun watching him come up with a response he thinks is reasonable. They're hilarious.

[Sid-Knee]

Neither Joshua-Usyk fight was particularly close unless you happen to be a UK resident under the influence of very strong narcotics.

The first and third Estrada-Gonzalez fights were close. Gonzalez was robbed in the second fight, I agree.

Estrada is Mexican, not American. Gonzalez is from Nicaragua.

I'm talking about Americans AND Mexicans getting a mass of robberies. It's all you ever see. That's on top of their opponents always being sabotaged.

We could go over those Usyk/Joshua fights, but we both know you're not going to. No matter how many facts i put down, you'll run away and refuse to go any further. They were close fights. I accept AJ lost, so what would i have to gain by saying this?

The first fight between Gonzales and Estrada was competitive, but Gonzales won the fight 9/3 on my card. It was clear to see Gonzales was taking the rounds. Just like it was easy to see in the third fight. Gonzales started slow, yes. It's because he's past it now. But he picked it up and won 8 rounds.

Don't tell me, you think Martinez beat Cordova the other week too?

[BlackRobb]

I'm talking about Americans AND Mexicans getting a mass of robberies. It's all you ever see. That's on top of their opponents always being sabotaged.

We could go over those Usyk/Joshua fights, but we both know you're not going to. No matter how many facts i put down, you'll run away and refuse to go any further. They were close fights. I accept AJ lost, so what would i have to gain by saying this?

The first fight between Gonzales and Estrada was competitive, but Gonzales won the fight 9/3 on my card. It was clear to see Gonzales was taking the rounds. Just like it was easy to see in the third fight. Gonzales started slow, yes. It's because he's past it now. But he picked it up and won 8 rounds.

Don't tell me, you think Martinez beat Cordova the other week too?

You really need to get back on your meds. The first and third fights were very close. Gonzalez was robbed in the second.

Neither Usyk-Joshua fight was close. If you want to play the freeze frame count-the-punches game, play it by yourself.

[Sid-Knee]

You really need to get back on your meds. The first and third fights were very close. Gonzalez was robbed in the second.

Neither Usyk-Joshua fight was close. If you want to play the freeze frame count-the-punches game, play it by yourself.

You won't go over the Gonzales/Estrada and AJ/Usyk fights because you know what happens. My cards are on the money. Your cards are typical North American cards which make them the worst in the world.

I suppose you had Martinez winning as well, right?

[Sid-Knee]

You really need to get back on your meds. The first and third fights were very close. Gonzalez was robbed in the second.

Neither Usyk-Joshua fight was close. If you want to play the freeze frame count-the-punches game, play it by yourself.

Have you accepted AJ could have got the robbery decisions if Eddie wanted that now? As i say, he doesn't need to pay anyone shlt. They just do it anyway. It's in their nature. It's all they do.