Comments Thread For: Timothy Bradley to Canelo Alvarez: 'When Are You Going to Stand Up?'
Collapse
-
-
And that mongrel Bradley didn’t fight a war torn Pacquiao and an over the hill Marquez? Why didn’t he stick around for young Spence? Crawford, Thurman, Garcia? He has no room to talk.
The problem was the best names he fought were all old and past their primes. Take the opponents he fought who were 35 and older when they fought off his resume and it looks a bit thinner.
Problem was, lots of people ignored this while it was going on. Its only now that it seems to be on everyone's radarComment
-
Comment
-
Actually that war torn guy Pacquiao beat the shyt out of the welterweight Champion 7 years after he lost to Tim Bradley.
Maybe you just missed it, no big deal.
Last edited by factsarenice; 03-26-2024, 08:14 PM.Comment
-
Yes he beat Bradley 3 times too. Bradley’s biggest win is vs an over the hill Marquez. He then then got a gift win vs Provdniwhatever and was out on his feet vs Vargas. Got his ass whipped by Pacquiao in his last fight and called it quits before ever thinking of facing Spence, Crawford, Thurman or Garcia. So his opinion means sh.it.Comment
-
Its only strange if you have not been paying attention. All those good fighters he fought were either not dangerous or past their prime. He has not fought a single prime killer in his whole career, so it should be no surprise he is ducking Benavidez. GGG was 35 when he fought him, almost 1 decade older than Canelo. Benavidez is the opposite and of course much bigger than GGG.
Comment
-
He’s right though and you know it. Just admit he’s taking the less dangerous fighter. He’s ducking Benavidez.
Yes he beat Bradley 3 times too. Bradley’s biggest win is vs an over the hill Marquez. He then then got a gift win vs Provdniwhatever and was out on his feet vs Vargas. Got his ass whipped by Pacquiao in his last fight and called it quits before ever thinking of facing Spence, Crawford, Thurman or Garcia. So his opinion means sh.it.Comment
Comment