Comments Thread For: Tyson Fury-Anthony Joshua: Timothy Bradley Wants a King of England

[dan-b]

Talking about "versions" of fighters is lazy commentary.

[IAMTHAT]

Who cares what Bradley wants. Every word that drips from his lips is bias and full of agenda. I cannot believe that they have him commentate. That role requires absolute Switzerland and he is the opposite of that.

My absolutely favorite commentator. I never seen a commentator predict what’s about to happen in a fight as Bradley and openings and strategies that Bradley sees.

I don’t see him being biased at all. Fighters he used to praise he would rip apart during a bad performance.

[IAMTHAT]

Talking about "versions" of fighters is lazy commentary.

If a fighter is known to come in shape and prepared and other times out of shape with lazy training, then there are versions of fighters.

[hugh grant]

If fury beats usyk, then fury should immediately fight josh. If fury loses to usyk, he should fight immediately fight josh also.
Moral of story is usy k v fury rematch can wait and that fury v josh is longest marinaded fight in boxing put Nelo marinating benavides fight to shame.

[dan-b]

Boxing always gets in its own way.

It's because of the ridiculous contract negotiations:

1. First there's the tedious "muh A side", "muh split" argument.
2. Then they want a rematch clause.
3. They they start bickering about the "split" for the rematch before the first fight's even happened!
4. And that's before they get to things like venue, location, gloves, etc.

[N/A]

"But have you seen this guy’s run and what he’s been able to do in the last year, last year and a half? He’s looked fantastic." Let's move to the next step of exaggeration and overexaggerate top 30 Franklin, top 40 two-fights-in-one-week Helenius. The only impressive thing he did is how he swept the ring with Francis.

[Smash]

king charles is not about to give up his crown to either of those bozos