Comments Thread For: Gonzalez: "Terence Crawford Had One Belt, And He Was The Best In The World"

[Hard Hands]

No the dude wasn’t complimenting Crawford.

He was trying to say he doesn’t need to win all the other belts to be pound 4 pound and that winning just one would be enough to put him there.

Im calling the boxer out on his bs because Crawford didn’t become p4p by just winning one belt.

That boxer is misleading the casual fans.

Crawford was unified at 135 and undisputed at 140. He is now undisputed at 147

I agree in your assessment on Crawford's greatness and I think that's indisputable BUT we have a difference of opinion. Just because he didn't spell it out doesn't mean he was being disrespectful again I saw it as a compliment and most us do. Your entitled to your opinion and we can agree to disagree, but most people on this post saw as a compliment and we all can't be wrong.

[Doubledagger]

I agree in your assessment on Crawford's greatness and I think that's indisputable BUT we have a difference of opinion. Just because he didn't spell it out doesn't mean he was being disrespectful again I saw it as a compliment and most us do. You’re entitled to your opinion and we can agree to disagree, but most people on this post saw as a compliment and we all can't be wrong.

Who said anything about “disrespectful”?

That just proves beyond reasonable doubt that you’re completely missing the point of everything I said.

Crawford’s greatness is not even the subject of my argument, it’s merely the object.

Read carefully before you respond

[Hard Hands]

Who said anything about “disrespectful”?

That just proves beyond reasonable doubt that you’re completely missing the point of everything I said.

Crawford’s greatness is not even the subject of my argument, it’s merely the object.

Read carefully before you respond

No I read your comment carefully. What you fail to understand is because the fighter in his interview failed to mention all of Crawford's accolades at that moment he was somehow denigrating him and saying he can win one belt and still be great. Again I took it as he was doing an interview and still gave Crawford his props. There is no denying and I mean no one can, Crawford is a future HOF,!!! The fighter is saying that he can possibly win a belt or two and at maybe different weight classes and not be undisputed but can still be considered a great fighter and that is a true statement. As a fighter you do not have to be undisputed to be considered great!!! Peace

[garfios]

No I read your comment carefully. What you fail to understand is because the fighter in his interview failed to mention all of Crawford's accolades at that moment he was somehow denigrating him and saying he can win one belt and still be great. Again I took it as he was doing an interview and still gave Crawford his props. There is no denying and I mean no one can, Crawford is a future HOF,!!! The fighter is saying that he can possibly win a belt or two and at maybe different weight classes and not be undisputed but can still be considered a great fighter and that is a true statement. As a fighter you do not have to be undisputed to be considered great!!! Peace

I don't think they understood the quote. He was saying that like Crawford, one can win a belt and be great just like when Crawford had one a belt I least that's what i understood he said.

[Doubledagger]

No I read your comment carefully. What you fail to understand is because the fighter in his interview failed to mention all of Crawford's accolades at that moment he was somehow denigrating him and saying he can win one belt and still be great. Again I took it as he was doing an interview and still gave Crawford his props. There is no denying and I mean no one can, Crawford is a future HOF,!!! The fighter is saying that he can possibly win a belt or two and at maybe different weight classes and not be undisputed but can still be considered a great fighter and that is a true statement. As a fighter you do not have to be undisputed to be considered great!!! Peace

Like I said, most post has nothing to do with Crawford or his Greatness, nor am I even implying that said fighter is hating or disrespecting Crawford.

You’re still missing the point

[Smash]

good idea for a new ranking system, the more belts u have the higher u are & thats it