I don't know if she's done yet. That ring rust is serious. Joshua fought 3 times this year and didn't look great in the first 2 fights. Wilder could use some rounds to truly judge where he's at.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Doentay Wilder is……
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by daggum View Post
ah the old sit back and wait for people to lose strategy. so its not so much what wilder did which was very little but what joshua did and that was lose, but when you continually fight good opposition you inevitably are more prone to losing. that doesnt mean people who sit back fighting bums are better than you and thats what wilder did. the modern equivalent is tank and loma. loma taking the tough fights and taking some losses, tank sitting back fighting weak comp but he continues to win. ruiz is a damn good fighter anyway, way underrated at the time of the joshua fight. way better and more accomplished than wilder in my mind and joshua avenged his loss which he should be given credit for
That is what rational fans do.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Roberto Vasquez View Post
People said the same about Joshua being finished after his Ruiz loss. It's only over if Wilder thinks it is - and he has barely fought for the last 2 years. So maybe he has given up? This could have just been a payday for him
Comment
-
Originally posted by daggum View Postjoshua was always several tiers above wilder. before the wilder fanatics claimed wilder was better because only fury beat wilder, while ignoring wilders severe lack of resume in the process. now wilder just got schooled by a solid but not great fighter and you cant say that anymore. you have to just look at his resume...and its quite bad like i always said. wilders "greatness" was based on hype and fantasy. joshuas "greatnes" on his accomplishments. joshua losing to ruiz and usyk doesnt change that he still has a very good resume. wilder losign to parker should change everyones perception, but the reality was always the same.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
No it’s the losses against poor quality opponents effect how people rate boxers.
That is what rational fans do.
The Big Dunn likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Raggamuffin View PostAt least Joshua fans are back after his wins over Wallin and Helenius lol…
Comment
-
Originally posted by daggum View Post
ah the old sit back and wait for people to lose strategy. so its not so much what wilder did which was very little but what joshua did and that was lose, but when you continually fight good opposition you inevitably are more prone to losing. that doesnt mean people who sit back fighting bums are better than you and thats what wilder did. the modern equivalent is tank and loma. loma taking the tough fights and taking some losses, tank sitting back fighting weak comp but he continues to win. ruiz is a damn good fighter anyway, way underrated at the time of the joshua fight. way better and more accomplished than wilder in my mind and joshua avenged his loss which he should be given credit for
Comment
-
Originally posted by juggernaut666 View Post
Wallin would be Wilders best win so let that sink in . And he’d probably lose on points bc Wallin is a better boxer then Parker unfortunately for you guys Joshua exists and can make guys like that look average so it goes beyond Fury who also looked liked crap against a guy with no boxing record……...LEVELS . Lol
Comment
-
Originally posted by Raggamuffin View PostBecause Wallin cut Fury, lmao…. I didnt forget Joshua’s losses let alone his style. The Helenius and Wallin disguises won’t work on me. But he has a chance to finally fight Fury should Fury beat Usyk.
Comment
Comment