Tweet
Im not following this farce too closely but is this statement from a newspaper relevant as to why this is going on
"However, the Mail report that the NADP's decision to lift Benn's suspension in fact 'focused heavily' on UKAD’s inability to rule on VADA tests and did not include an examination of science explaining why clomifene was found in Benn's system"
Is this appeal basically a way to force 'someone' to look at this science and make a judgment call on it, after all, hes saying he got it via contaminated eggs i think, twice
"However, the Mail report that the NADP's decision to lift Benn's suspension in fact 'focused heavily' on UKAD’s inability to rule on VADA tests and did not include an examination of science explaining why clomifene was found in Benn's system"
Is this appeal basically a way to force 'someone' to look at this science and make a judgment call on it, after all, hes saying he got it via contaminated eggs i think, twice
Comment