Comments Thread For: Parker: Tyson Fury Gave Me Some Advice, Some Knowledge on Fighting Wilder

[PRINCEKOOL]

I said arguably, it was a good fight and the draw seemed fair to me. The third fight was the best of the the three.

The draw was definitively correct decision 'But if any fighter could of possibly been given the win? That fighter should of been Deontay Wilder'.

But even in that situation? I would not say that giving any fighter the clear win was the right decision.

Therefore Tyson Fury vs Deontay Wilder I 'Was a draw'.

The way people **** on about the first fight, you would think it was a controversial decision to the level of Lennox Lewis vs Evander Holyfield I 'It was nowhere near, that level of controversy'.

In fact Fury vs Wilder I, was not a controversial decision to anyone who is honest with themselves 'Fury did not dominate the fight, did not inflict enough damage. And his defense was breached by Deontay Wilder'.

It is only the people who don't want to give Deontay Wilder any credit, who try and play it off as a Fury win.

Note: The third fight Skill for skill was the worst fight, but? In terms of passion, and competition 'Yes I will agree, it was the best fight'. I regard Joshua vs Usyk I & II skill or skill as being higher level fights than Wilder vs Fury III 'But as a overall match up, the passion and jeopardy. I enjoyed Deontay Wilder vs Tyson Fury the most' etc.