Francis Ngannou landed more power shots, floor Fury and had him scared. Who won? Fury's reputation lost.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Tyson Fury vs. Francis Ngannou - CompuBox Punch Stats
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Leicesterage View PostInteresting.
Tyson Fury lands more punches according to Compubox, NSB says he lost.
Yet when Manny Pacquiao landed less punches against Floyd according to that same Compubox, NSB said he won and Compubox is corrupt.
You just can't make it up.
Comment
-
Clean effective striking = ngannou
fury throws out flimsy jabs then make funny face is not the same as ngannou rocking him, cutting him and dropping him with clean effective offense
literally boxings judging criteria.
fury was running away giving Ngannou ring generalship
ngannou was unmarked. Never in trouble and never dropped displaying superiority in defence as well
but fury threw more flimsy jabs that did fok all so therefore he won? You would have to be an idiotStuntman Mike likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Just goes to show how much of a robbery it was
Everytime ngannou landed it dealt serious damage to the body and head
A flicking jab back for your troubles or an arm punch right hand do not equate to turned over power shots
Shows how much of a robbery this fight was with the punch stats being so close
Comment
-
Originally posted by Leicesterage View PostInteresting.
Tyson Fury lands more punches according to Compubox, NSB says he lost.
Yet when Manny Pacquiao landed less punches against Floyd according to that same Compubox, NSB said he won and Compubox is corrupt.
You just can't make it up.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Leicesterage View PostInteresting.
Tyson Fury lands more punches according to Compubox, NSB says he lost.
Yet when Manny Pacquiao landed less punches against Floyd according to that same Compubox, NSB said he won and Compubox is corrupt.
You just can't make it up.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by THE REED View Post
This isn't amateurs.
Landing more doesn't mean you win.
What I want is for NSB to be consistent - and the easy way to do that is to COMPLETELY STOP using Compubox as the measure for who won a fight.
They used it to justify Golovkin winning fights, Manny winning fights, Chino winning fights, etc.- Thurman OUTLANDED Manny Pacquiao according to Compubox - yet NSB said that Manny "clearly" won (he didn't) because Manny landed the "cleaner, harder punches".
- Thurman OUTLANDED Josesito according to Compubox (percentage) - yet NSB said that Josesito "clearly" won (he didn't) because Rocky landed the "cleaner, harder punches".
- Spence OUTLANDED Porter according to Compubox (percentage) - yet NSB said that Porter "clearly" won (he didn't) because Porter landed the "cleaner, harder punches".
- Haney OUTLANDED Loma according to Compubox (percentage) - yet NSB swore that Loma was "robbed" (he wasn't) because Loma landed the "cleaner, harder punches".
- Loma OUTLANDED Teofimo according to Compubox (percentage) - yet NSB swore that Teofimo "clearly" won (he didn't) beause Teo landed the "cleaner, harder punches".
- Canelo OUTLANDED Golovkin in ALL THREE FIGHTS according to Compubox (percentage) - yet NSB swears to this day that Canelo has never beaten Golovkin (he did) because Golovkin landed the "cleaner, harder punches" and "his jab is like a power punch".
- Mayweather OUTLANDED Logan Paul at an almost 5-1 ratio according to Compubox (percentage) - yet NSB swears that Paul beat Mayweather because of one sequence.
Yet, when Wilder dropped Fury in the first fight, NSB didn't say that Wilder beat Fury.
My point is, #1 Compubox is NOT accurate. So it should not be used as the measure for who won a fight. And any past or future fights where someone is doing that, NSB needs to shut that person down immediately because it's BS.
Comment
Comment