Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Tyson Fury vs. Francis Ngannou - CompuBox Punch Stats

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Francis Ngannou landed more power shots, floor Fury and had him scared. Who won? Fury's reputation lost.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by Leicesterage View Post
      Interesting.

      Tyson Fury lands more punches according to Compubox, NSB says he lost.

      Yet when Manny Pacquiao landed less punches against Floyd according to that same Compubox, NSB said he won and Compubox is corrupt.

      You just can't make it up.
      If you think total punches landed determines the winner you should stop watching the sport because you don't understand it.

      Comment


      • #13
        Clean effective striking = ngannou


        fury throws out flimsy jabs then make funny face is not the same as ngannou rocking him, cutting him and dropping him with clean effective offense


        literally boxings judging criteria.

        fury was running away giving Ngannou ring generalship

        ngannou was unmarked. Never in trouble and never dropped displaying superiority in defence as well




        but fury threw more flimsy jabs that did fok all so therefore he won? You would have to be an idiot
        Stuntman Mike Stuntman Mike likes this.

        Comment


        • #14
          Just goes to show how much of a robbery it was

          Everytime ngannou landed it dealt serious damage to the body and head

          A flicking jab back for your troubles or an arm punch right hand do not equate to turned over power shots

          Shows how much of a robbery this fight was with the punch stats being so close

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by Leicesterage View Post
            Interesting.

            Tyson Fury lands more punches according to Compubox, NSB says he lost.

            Yet when Manny Pacquiao landed less punches against Floyd according to that same Compubox, NSB said he won and Compubox is corrupt.

            You just can't make it up.
            You've just shown how little you know about boxing

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by Leicesterage View Post
              Interesting.

              Tyson Fury lands more punches according to Compubox, NSB says he lost.

              Yet when Manny Pacquiao landed less punches against Floyd according to that same Compubox, NSB said he won and Compubox is corrupt.

              You just can't make it up.
              Lol he landed more jabs.. And he only outlander Francis by 11 overall. Francis shook Tyson everytime he landed and clearly landed the more damaging blows. One of the biggest robberies in boxing ever

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by I_Didn't_Hear_No_Bell View Post

                If you think total punches landed determines the winner you should stop watching the sport because you don't understand it.
                You're speaking to a guy so obsessed with "agendas" he's bringing up a fight from over 8 years ago.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Compubox is not "corrupt", it's just not definitive when it comes to determining a winner. It's a useful piece of evidence at best. Simpletons can't understand these concepts so want absolutes they can more easily understand.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Fury simps be like those flimsy jabs count the same as power shots.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by THE REED View Post

                      This isn't amateurs.

                      Landing more doesn't mean you win.
                      You're correct.

                      What I want is for NSB to be consistent - and the easy way to do that is to COMPLETELY STOP using Compubox as the measure for who won a fight.

                      They used it to justify Golovkin winning fights, Manny winning fights, Chino winning fights, etc.
                      • Thurman OUTLANDED Manny Pacquiao according to Compubox - yet NSB said that Manny "clearly" won (he didn't) because Manny landed the "cleaner, harder punches".
                      • Thurman OUTLANDED Josesito according to Compubox (percentage) - yet NSB said that Josesito "clearly" won (he didn't) because Rocky landed the "cleaner, harder punches".
                      • Spence OUTLANDED Porter according to Compubox (percentage) - yet NSB said that Porter "clearly" won (he didn't) because Porter landed the "cleaner, harder punches".
                      • Haney OUTLANDED Loma according to Compubox (percentage) - yet NSB swore that Loma was "robbed" (he wasn't) because Loma landed the "cleaner, harder punches".
                      • Loma OUTLANDED Teofimo according to Compubox (percentage) - yet NSB swore that Teofimo "clearly" won (he didn't) beause Teo landed the "cleaner, harder punches".
                      • Canelo OUTLANDED Golovkin in ALL THREE FIGHTS according to Compubox (percentage) - yet NSB swears to this day that Canelo has never beaten Golovkin (he did) because Golovkin landed the "cleaner, harder punches" and "his jab is like a power punch".
                      • Mayweather OUTLANDED Logan Paul at an almost 5-1 ratio according to Compubox (percentage) - yet NSB swears that Paul beat Mayweather because of one sequence.
                      But yet, when Mykal Fox outlanded Maestre, NSB screamed robbery when Maestre got his hand raised - despite the fact that NONE of Fox's punches had any power or force behind them whatsoever. NSB said "he dropped him doe!"

                      Yet, when Wilder dropped Fury in the first fight, NSB didn't say that Wilder beat Fury.

                      My point is, #1 Compubox is NOT accurate. So it should not be used as the measure for who won a fight. And any past or future fights where someone is doing that, NSB needs to shut that person down immediately because it's BS.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP