Comments Thread For: Tommy Fury Edges KSI By Majority Decision in Lackluster Fight

[Stuntman Mike]

I backed Fury to beat Deontay Wilder in the rematch, leading up to that fight 'I made many posts, stating he was going to use the same or similar tactics he used vs USS Cunningham.

Wilder III, I never back any fighter to win 100% 'I was neutral, but of course I create theories on how each fighter can win. I gave Wilder a chance, and I think I was right considering how the fight action played out'.

Many people were apprehensive during the build up to Wilder II, even most of the hardcore Fury fans 'You was quite certain about Fury winning'.

Whyte vs Fury, I backed Fury to win 'Or I wanted him to win, due to Whyte behavior during the build up'.

The only real fights that I have continually stated would be Fury's biggest Challenge stylistically, are Joshua and Usyk 'And even still Wilder I think would be able to still push Fury if the 4th fight is ever called for'.

There are not many fights were you can back the other opponent to beat Fury, because Fury is not exactly fighting top level fighters.

Fury vs Usyk ? I have not at this stage backed a fighter to win 100% 'I am just in the process of analyzing the match up, and creating theories. But I have made it clear, that even at this stage I am finding multiple ways in which Usyk can win against this version of Fury'.

You was on the actual thread, were I made this post 'The post may have actually been in response to one of your posts'.

Note: So Wilder III, most likely that was the fight were I was closest to backing Fury to lose. But I did state that I was neutral, on the eve of the fight.

When stated that I am neutral, it is because? Sometimes I don't want to see a fighter lose 'I actually did not want to see Fury lose that fight'. I could easily picked a winner or back somebody to win, but I will purposely hold back 'The last fight were I was in this situation was Smith vs Eubank Junior II'.

Overall Fury really is not involved in fights were he is challenged stylistically in my opinion, that is how he has been promoted and managed 'He will only take on big fights when he really has to, and we are kind of at that stage of his career again' etc.

Usyk and joshua have the potential to counter or punch inbetween furys punches more than wilder or wladimir could have so I am interested in those fights too as I think they could be very competitive.

Either of those fights will have moments for both fighters and id like to see fury lose tbh to shut the fury fanatics up

[Stuntman Mike]

Anyways come next Saturday people might not show their faces round here anymore either that or they'll be saying francis could ko ali and Mike tyson on the same night if furys as great as they think

Fury will be getting rattled by francis i have foreseen it

[Someone88]

Logan, KSI and Tommy did what they could do.

[deathofaclown]

You need to go and watch fury mcdermott 1 then get back to picking holes in alis early career whilst he was still maturing as a heavyweight

And why are you mentioning wepner,you're clutching at straws considering anyone with eyes can see ali slipped against wepner.

Fury was a very young man in his early 20s when he put in a bad performance against McDermott because he was unprepared and didn't train... and he came back the next fight and completely flattened him quickly.

if you want to defend ali saying he was young against the likes of Henry Cooper, then you can say that about Fury in is performance against McDermott.

all Fighters are allowed bad performances on the way up, it's part of learning but prime for prime ...Ali would have been able to do nothing with Fury except try to fiddle his way through the fight.

[deathofaclown]

Anyways come next Saturday people might not show their faces round here anymore either that or they'll be saying francis could ko ali and Mike tyson on the same night if furys as great as they think

Fury will be getting rattled by francis i have foreseen it

You didn't answer the question about which fights you picked Fury to lose

[Stuntman Mike]

You didn't answer the question about which fights you picked Fury to lose

I said he's the best of a bad bunch and I honestly think he will be in trouble against francis,joshua and usyk

Usyk being the best chance to beat the big dosser

[$quabbles94806]

Is this sideshow circus the new standard of Boxing? Because these fighters have very little skill and knowledge. smh.

[Butt stuff]

Why on earth would a heavyweight boil down? They don't have to make weight

They were very small heavyweights by todays standards. Ali had his debut at 192lbs. He was a cruiserweight. He's was a smaller man than Usyk.

Fury would run these guys over. Too big, too strong. Yeah Ali might have fiddled him around for a few rounds but when Fury got on top of him, he'd have no chance.

Big George was seen as a big heavyweight, he was 6'3" and 215lbs with slow feet and telegraphed shots and small by todays standards. He would have absolutely no chance against someone like Fury. It would look like Fury v Chisora, actually worse because Foreman was 215lbs and quite short. He would get bullied with ease.

Foreman would be one of the easiest fights of Fury's career, 100%

Guy shouldn't be giving his opinion on anything boxing after saying that.

Glad to see the dude is on my block list for a reason. I usually forget why I block people, but then see their dog water ludicrous opinions quoted by other forum members and I'm instantly reminded.