Comments Thread For: Canelo: I Agree With [Critics], That I Haven't Looked The Last Few Fights Like I Used To

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • archiemoore1
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Mar 2008
    • 3431
    • 1,775
    • 22
    • 21,278

    #21
    Originally posted by garfios

    He has looked flat when fighting a fast technical boxer, he looked like crap ehen he fought Mayweather and Lara, even the Trout figh, and it was a fixed fight with the open score, and he was in his twenties. What other boxers similar to those he has fought after?
    In some ways, he looked flat against Ryder, who isn't that style at all. So he's been flat in general, not just against good boxers

    Comment

    • james240
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Mar 2017
      • 1164
      • 191
      • 0
      • 19,005

      #22
      Originally posted by archiemoore1

      In some ways, he looked flat against Ryder, who isn't that style at all. So he's been flat in general, not just against good boxers
      Uhh not sure about that never seen Ryder get brutalized like that before.

      Comment

      • hugh grant
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2006
        • 30399
        • 2,179
        • 877
        • 105,596

        #23
        At least your fight and winning since loss to bivol. Wilder not really trying to make up for his loss to fury. So I think the standards for nelo higher

        Comment

        • CPNUTKnockoutFreshMart
          Freshest FreshMart
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • May 2012
          • 4130
          • 3,218
          • 10,209
          • 6,012

          #24
          Bivol is a moron for not rematching Canelo , like he's going to make even ten percent of the money fighting anyone else and Canelo was a relatively easy fight for him. It's a bonehead move, unless he was going to fight Beterbiev next , which he didn't.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP