aint even have to bring GGG into this, canelo beating cotto cleans out anyone TC have on his resume.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Team Crawford Member Fires Back At Canelo: "The Only Great Fighter He Beat Was GGG"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Bronx2245 View PostHowever, many people would watch it, if the rematch is at 154, just because they want to see if the weight change makes a difference! Nobody believes Bud can beat Canelo @ 168, but they would watch that too!
Fighting Canelo is not the same thing as fighting a guy he already destroyed.
You keep saying “many people want to see it” but it’s not true. Bud will be a 20-1 favorite to destroy Spence again. It is a meaningless fight.
This would be akin to Floyd rematching Marquez at 144 as agreed. Marquez himself said he would have never beaten Floyd at any weight.
Bud fighting Canelo is a gallant challenge hence the intrigue.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Oregonian View Post———-
Fighting Canelo is not the same thing as fighting a guy he already destroyed.
You keep saying “many people want to see it” but it’s not true. Bud will be a 20-1 favorite to destroy Spence again. It is a meaningless fight.
This would be akin to Floyd rematching Marquez at 144 as agreed. Marquez himself said he would have never beaten Floyd at any weight.
Bud fighting Canelo is a gallant challenge hence the intrigue.
Eff Pandas likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bronx2245 View PostMany people, including Bob Arum and Eddie Hearn, thought the first fight would be too expensive, and a flop! They were wrong! If the rematch is AT 154, it's an easy sell, because the fans know (or will be persuaded) Errol was too big for 147! It won't sell like the first fight, but it will sell more than Haney vs. Prograis, and Benavidez vs. Andrade! Spence is NOT Marquez!
You are right about one thing, the rematch would sell more than Haney and Benavidez vs Andrade. So in a business sense, it makes sense and cents.
Do you think the rematch will have a different outcome?
Spence is not Marquez but the logic is exactly the same. Also, this was a unification fight at 147 and Spence made weight just like he did when he beat ALL his other opponents so why should he be viewed differently now that he got destroyed by Bud?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Oregonian View Post————
You are right about one thing, the rematch would sell more than Haney and Benavidez vs Andrade. So in a business sense, it makes sense and cents.
Do you think the rematch will have a different outcome?
Spence is not Marquez but the logic is exactly the same. Also, this was a unification fight at 147 and Spence made weight just like he did when he beat ALL his other opponents so why should he be viewed differently now that he got destroyed by Bud?
Oregonian likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by turnedup View PostI’m the delusional one but which one of us is up here defending a ped cheat? He faced three fighters in their prime chump. You really wanna do this? I’ll shhhhhh all over you and your Canelo fandom marica. Dudes be up here trying to change the narrative. Context matters. So if I fought Duran, Floyd, sugar Ray, and dug Archie Moore out of his grave I’d be a great fighter too according to you. This dude fought a bunch of no hopers, his resume does not lie. Y’all wanna use that bullshhhh about active fighters resumes like he didn’t have anything to do just as much as MAYWEATHER did in making this sport about the money not the competition. Also, funny how it took him that long to even make the first Golovkin fight, he dumped his belt to try and wait it out. Go sit somewhere with a dunce cap.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jab jab boom View PostThat’s my point, the thing that separates Canelo’s resume from tigers is that he got the chance to fight a bunch of great but past prime fighters. Take away Mosley, Mayweather, Cotto, Ggg x3 and Kovalev from his resume (who were all between 35-40 when he faced them) , you’re left with a barely above average list of opposition faced.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Calibaloc View Post
Sorry but your statement is absolute nonsense because on paper he could have lost ALL of those fights. Again, what active fighter has a better resume? If none then u have no point...
Comment
Comment