Comments Thread For: Prograis: That Undisputed **** Really Don't matter; It Depend on Who You Beat

[BIGPOPPAPUMP]

Regis Prograis apparently isn't sold on what many perceive to be one of the pinnacles of boxing achievements. In a recent interview, the WBC 140-pound titlist from New Orleans poured water over the concept of the undisputed champion, a distinction given to a fighter who is able to collect all four major titles in a given division.
[Click Here To Read More]

[Tibburon245]

True--they have created a mass of titles that all say "world champ." Better in the days of Henry Armstrong when there were only 8 titles.

[ShoulderRoll]

Kambosos beat Teofimo who beat Lomachenko.

Devin Haney’s undisputed titles have legit lineage. Plus he just beat Lomachenko anyway in a close fight.

[PNUT901]

If he was Undisputed he'd look at it differently. Not knocking The Rougarou , just pointing out human nature.

[SplitSecond]

True to a degree. To me Haney’s still only beatenLinares, Gamboa & Rambo Kambo.

[Smash]

undisputed is good but i wouldnt go overboard with it, sometimes it can be achieved in 1 fight & some roads are harder than others & often the achievers are humbled not long after, its can be more about boxing politics and catching guys at the right time

[Greenfield02]

Completely agree... but don't say anything to Crawford fans (140) or Haney fans..... it's amazing how winning multiple paper belts all if sudden makes P4P best....

[TheWinners]

Thank you someone who gets it. Especially earning it the Devin Haney way. Let someone else do the dirty work then fight them.

[Hitmon]

I don’t trust Regis , if he beats Devin he will talking about how he beat undisputed champion.

[El_Mero]

Funny how he says this NOW. Still hope he beat tf outta Haney