Comments Thread For: David Haye on Eubank-Smith: No Reason For Trilogy, Rematch Was So Conclusive

[PRINCEKOOL]

2 completely different fights. You are talking like the first fight was the same as the second with the exception of one lucky punch.

They are two different fights mate.

Eubank Junior's win was overall 1000% more conclusive. Out boxed Smith, Beat up Smith, Stopped Smith.

Smith during the first fight, dropped the first two rounds then produced a anomaly type punch 'He did not do it this time around did he? Never decked Eubank Junior or hurt him that badly'.

Both fighters are 1 - 1, with Eubank Junior's win being complete domination.

If Smith can get some comeback wins, then the rematch can happen 'If not there is zero point in the fight for Eubank Junior'.

There are bigger domestic fights out there for him, and he can also aim for a World title challenge.

If Smith was that good a fighter, if his skills were miles better than Eubank Junior's 'He would of won this rematch, but he did not'.

Smith's has stated that his brothers would not let him fight if he was out of condition, so really they all need to stay quiet and just give Eubank Junior credit 'Smith did not win a single round vs Eubank Junior and he was beaten up'.

That is the conclusive of it mate, deal with the information and reality of the game etc.

[hugh grant]

Well, interesting fights are always worth a revisit. It's one apiece now. But maybe sometime down line. Connor Benn needs fight