How to make a 100+ response thread in NSB...

[lparm]

You just described Flawless to a T, except for maybe #5.

^ This.

[Kevin Jesus]

I know a poster that swears Calzaghe beat a prime Roy Jones and actually argues about it. I don't know if he's just being sarcastic or something.

[Chr0nic]

there are 100+ ways of making a 100+ thread and making a how to make a 100+ thread is NOT one of them

[Spacey1991]

Just some of my thoughts. Feel free to add in your own secret recipe ingredients!

I) Discuss Floyd Mayweather, Jr.(Optional: Shane Mosley).

II) Discuss Manny Pacquiao (Optional: Miguel Cotto).

III) Make outrageous statements by:

(a) creating controversy through racial and/or nationalistic tension (e.g. Manny ducks black fighters, why white Eastern European fighters dominate black American boxers in upper divisions...),

(b) discrediting resumes of said fighter(s) (e.g. Corrales was weight-drained, Marquez won both fights, Cotto's resume ****s on Floyd's, etc.),

(c) making up your own **** and defending it as fact (e.g. Calzaghe beat a prime Roy).

Optional Ingredients:
-Post pictures of said fighters' wives.
-Insert specifically Floyd's finances/PPV buys into thread.
-Quote Roger or Floyd Sr.

I wanna add to that... also trying to state that Floyd's boats are an investment can do the trick. Saying that if you add bathrooms and bedrooms to it he can sell them for a $2,000,000 profit.

Seriously though, just imagine how many responses a thread would get will all of those things in it.

[Spacey1991]

there are 100+ ways of making a 100+ thread and making a how to make a 100+ thread is NOT one of them

Well by you saying that there are 100+ ways of making a 100+ thread and making a how to make a 100+ thread is not one of them is just gonna give it more of a chance for this 100+ thread to reach 100+ replies.

[vercingetorix3]

there are 100+ ways of making a 100+ thread and making a how to make a 100+ thread is NOT one of them

Agreed. Using proper grammar and talking about fighters not named Floyd or Manny is also NOT another way.

Seriously though, just imagine how many responses a thread would get will all of those things in it.

Indeed, the ultimate hypothetical thread would be...

"Floyd Mayweather, Sr.: 'Floyd and Manny, who lay claim to the P4P throne, duck prime black welterweights, white Eastern European fighters, as well as each other and cherrypick weight-drained boxers to earn purses worth millions of dollars that the IRS will seize as they juice up on anabolic steroids for their hot wives!'"

[Guest]

Is your goal 100 responses?

I can call in some troops and we can spam the **** out of it if you like.


Don't know what you are aiming for here.

[Verstyle]

Just some of my thoughts. Feel free to add in your own secret recipe ingredients!

I) Discuss Floyd Mayweather, Jr.(Optional: Shane Mosley).

II) Discuss Manny Pacquiao (Optional: Miguel Cotto).

III) Make outrageous statements by:

(a) creating controversy through racial and/or nationalistic tension (e.g. Manny ducks black fighters, why white Eastern European fighters dominate black American boxers in upper divisions...),

(b) discrediting resumes of said fighter(s) (e.g. Corrales was weight-drained, Marquez won both fights, Cotto's resume ****s on Floyd's, etc.),

(c) making up your own **** and defending it as fact (e.g. Calzaghe beat a prime Roy).

Optional Ingredients:
-Post pictures of said fighters' wives.
-Insert specifically Floyd's finances/PPV buys into thread.
-Quote Roger or Floyd Sr.

Good ****. Karma given.

[Verstyle]

Don't forget, "Floyd is the best fighter ever" then going by that with your own facts and statements like religion.

[vercingetorix3]

Is your goal 100 responses?

I can call in some troops and we can spam the **** out of it if you like.


Don't know what you are aiming for here.

Not really, I just wanted to type up my observations, that's all.