I voted Hearns has more power and Trinidad by stoppage, however I'm not so sure about that second one. I voted that way because I believe Hearns' chin was worse than Tito's. However, Hearns did have good boxing skills and Tito always showed vulnerability to good boxers, especially taller ones. I do believe that if Tito finds a way around Hearns' length, he would end up stopping him. SRL's left hooks F'd him up, imagine what Tito's would do.
Who has more power, and who would have won between Trinidad and Hearns?
Collapse
-
That's BS.
Tito had a chance against both Hearns and Duran. Come on, Hearns might have been able to KO/TKO Tito (took 12 rounds for Bhop), but his chin was absolute ****. He did get hit and I'm sure Tito would land a couple that could possibly put his ass on ***** street. Hearns got KTFO in five(?) by Hagler who went the distance with Duran. Tito lasted till the 12th with a very prime BHop and showed he could take a strong middleweights punch. Hearns ain't KO'ing jack...
Duran was a tough guy, but he did take shots. I think Tito KO's him in a long battle.
Tito's stretch as welterweight was undefeated. He outgunned Campas, Whitakker (old)...
You guys severely overrate the legends.


lol wowComment
-
Eh...Tito doesn't have SRL's foot speed or hand speed, difference here man. The way I see it, I'm being real unbiased here. Hearns would control distance, land the right hand at some point and finish Tito. Hearns was a better boxer then DLH.I voted Hearns has more power and Trinidad by stoppage, however I'm not so sure about that second one. I voted that way because I believe Hearns' chin was worse than Tito's. However, Hearns did have good boxing skills and Tito always showed vulnerability to good boxers, especially taller ones. I do believe that if Tito finds a way around Hearns' length, he would end up stopping him. SRL's left hooks F'd him up, imagine what Tito's would do.Comment
-
Ok first of all Trinidad had a better chin then Hearns did and Hearns could never handle a pressure fighter. And with Vargas on steriods for the fight against Tito thts wht kept him up. I think if Hearns got caught with tht left hook he would be out! Trinidad wins by stoppage , he hits too damn hard, and was actually a better boxer in his prime until he moved up to Middleweight and got flat footed, Hearns had no defense and would be KOD!Hearns in his prime vs Trinidad in his prime, who had more power, the man with a 1 punch KO over Duran or the man that went 12 rounds in a war before putting vargas away? Also who would have won a head to head prime for prime?
Vote and discuss, I feel strange even asking this.Comment
-
wow nothing. Younger Tito COULD box decently enough if he wanted to.
All I'm seeing is the typical old school boxers are GODS and unbeatable by contemporary boxers bull****.
Tito's could lose to both, but he could also beat both on a good day. To say they are untouchable and on another level is a crock of ****.
That's like saying Oscar, Mosley, Tito (90's fighters) couldn't possibly beat or win against the 80's crop of elites. BS, on any given night, either could win.Comment
-
You can't compare these two really. While Trinidad did have knockout power, he rarely knocked out his opponents with one punch, Hearns did it more often.Comment
-
Duran had the greatest defense I've ever seen, on the inside. Best believe that Tito's power will be reduced in half, Duran would be too slippery and would turn with Tito's punches. In all honesty, Duran would be happy to go in against Tito.That's BS.
Tito had a chance against both Hearns and Duran. Come on, Hearns might have been able to KO/TKO Tito (took 12 rounds for Bhop), but his chin was absolute ****. He did get hit and I'm sure Tito would land a couple that could possibly put his ass on ***** street. Hearns got KTFO in five(?) by Hagler who went the distance with Duran. Tito lasted till the 12th with a very prime BHop and showed he could take a strong middleweights punch. Hearns ain't KO'ing jack...
Duran was a tough guy, but he did take shots. I think Tito KO's him in a long battle.
Tito's stretch as welterweight was undefeated. He outgunned Campas, Whitakker (old)...
You guys severely overrate the legends.Comment
-
That's cause SRL's boxing skills >>> Tito's boxing skills. Tito moved forward and shifted his entire weight while he threw his left hook, making himself unbalanced and opening himself to counters and risking getting knocked down.I voted Hearns has more power and Trinidad by stoppage, however I'm not so sure about that second one. I voted that way because I believe Hearns' chin was worse than Tito's. However, Hearns did have good boxing skills and Tito always showed vulnerability to good boxers, especially taller ones. I do believe that if Tito finds a way around Hearns' length, he would end up stopping him. SRL's left hooks F'd him up, imagine what Tito's would do.Comment
-
You're right about the bold, still can't agree with you though.wow nothing. Younger Tito COULD box decently enough if he wanted to.
All I'm seeing is the typical old school boxers are GODS and unbeatable by contemporary boxers bull****.
Tito's could lose to both, but he could also beat both on a good day. To say they are untouchable and on another level is a crock of ****.
That's like saying Oscar, Mosley, Tito (90's fighters) couldn't possibly beat or win against the 80's crop of elites. BS, on any given night, either could win.Comment
-
.
Comment