Espinoza says that the rematch isn't mandatory for the winnner

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • satiev1
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Nov 2015
    • 4661
    • 575
    • 0
    • 78,492

    #1

    Espinoza says that the rematch isn't mandatory for the winnner

    VIDEO BELOW

  • _original_
    Dinamita
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jul 2009
    • 17838
    • 1,874
    • 789
    • 67,167

    #2
    Yeah, there is absolutely no need or interest for an immediate rematch. Spence was being brave by asking for it but you could tell in his body language and he knows he stands no chance now. His handlers would have to be sadistic to throw him back in there with Bud to finish off the rest of his career.

    I think this was a huge miscalculation from Haymon and PBC. Most likely they felt Spence would win or lose closely (so did I) to set up a rematch. Now what does PBC do with Buds second fight on their contract? They don’t have contracts with the two best viable options at 147 in Boots and Stanionis and Charlo is tied up. Ugas-Thurman winner (if it even happens) is the best option now and that’s meh. Danny at 154? Lol
    Last edited by _original_; 07-30-2023, 03:25 PM.

    Comment

    Working...
    TOP