Tweet
... I've said before I don't like volume and excess when I'm trying to watch a fight. Those gibbering cu nts even chattered over the start of Crawford talking to Spence in the corner post-bout.
Seriously, how does that even work?!!?
Commentator #1 (Joey F uckwit): "Wow, the two boxers people have tuned in to see are having a post-bout conversation. What would viewers rather hear - what they're saying to one another, or would they prefer me to carry on talking complete bulls hit?"
That ****** loud idiot that does the main talking, laughing when talking about Crawford landing 58% of his power shots. It's not a video game, it's a man being punched in the head, but respectful, you idiot.
To be honest, I don't know why he has to start every fight by telling the viewers utter bulls hit.
"and this FIGHTER is like a CYBORG KITTEN using LASER EYES to fly to the MOON and EVAPORATE it into CHEESE."
STFU you arsehole.
But what got to me was when they were WRONG.
In the action, I can get it. Crawford threw a counter in the first that either missed or was blocked (can't recall which) and they talked about it landing. Okay, fine, it was quick, you maybe weren't watching on the monitor, whatever. No biggee.
But then that first knockdown. It looked really impressive, like it was right on the target. So then they watched it again on slow motion to talk about it, and you actually saw that it appeared to miss Spence's head and actually hit him in the shoulder, knocking him down because he'd overreached and was slightly off balance.
So then one of the team say it was "right on the chin."
What's the point in watching a slow motion replay if you can't get the c unt right?
Don't get me wrong, we all make mistakes... but my point is, if you're gonna make mistakes, why the f uck am I listening to you and not being able to watch the fight in peace? STFU, c unts!
Seriously, how does that even work?!!?
Commentator #1 (Joey F uckwit): "Wow, the two boxers people have tuned in to see are having a post-bout conversation. What would viewers rather hear - what they're saying to one another, or would they prefer me to carry on talking complete bulls hit?"
That ****** loud idiot that does the main talking, laughing when talking about Crawford landing 58% of his power shots. It's not a video game, it's a man being punched in the head, but respectful, you idiot.
To be honest, I don't know why he has to start every fight by telling the viewers utter bulls hit.
"and this FIGHTER is like a CYBORG KITTEN using LASER EYES to fly to the MOON and EVAPORATE it into CHEESE."
STFU you arsehole.
But what got to me was when they were WRONG.
In the action, I can get it. Crawford threw a counter in the first that either missed or was blocked (can't recall which) and they talked about it landing. Okay, fine, it was quick, you maybe weren't watching on the monitor, whatever. No biggee.
But then that first knockdown. It looked really impressive, like it was right on the target. So then they watched it again on slow motion to talk about it, and you actually saw that it appeared to miss Spence's head and actually hit him in the shoulder, knocking him down because he'd overreached and was slightly off balance.
So then one of the team say it was "right on the chin."
What's the point in watching a slow motion replay if you can't get the c unt right?
Don't get me wrong, we all make mistakes... but my point is, if you're gonna make mistakes, why the f uck am I listening to you and not being able to watch the fight in peace? STFU, c unts!