What You WON'T See From Either Errol Spence or Terence Crawford

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Combat Talk Radio
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • May 2015
    • 21727
    • 2,781
    • 6,368
    • 83,247

    #1

    What You WON'T See From Either Errol Spence or Terence Crawford

    Throwback energy. Major trash talking in the ring. Multi-piece combos.

  • ProblemChild_JakePaul
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2022
    • 2294
    • 906
    • 817
    • 0

    #2
    I doubt we'll see either one bite the other's ear, either!

    Comment

    • Combat Talk Radio
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • May 2015
      • 21727
      • 2,781
      • 6,368
      • 83,247

      #3
      Originally posted by ProblemChild_JakePaul
      I doubt we'll see either one bite the other's ear, either!
      You never know. Crawford tends to get frustrated and do whatever at times.

      Comment

      • SplitSecond
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Nov 2009
        • 23151
        • 1,715
        • 1,187
        • 85,044

        #4
        Spence is actually very dirty. Every fight he throws numerous lowblows. Something Crawford should watch out for, anytime Spence is having a tough time, he goes ham directly on the other guys balls, whereas otherwise his bodyshots are typically lowblows on the hip joint.

        Comment

        • Combat Talk Radio
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • May 2015
          • 21727
          • 2,781
          • 6,368
          • 83,247

          #5
          Originally posted by SplitSecond
          Spence is actually very dirty. Every fight he throws numerous lowblows. Something Crawford should watch out for, anytime Spence is having a tough time, he goes ham directly on the other guys balls, whereas otherwise his bodyshots are typically lowblows on the hip joint.
          Nuh uh, don't do that.

          If you're going to call a "hip joint" shot a low blow, then you acknowledge that Crawford effectively beat Khan with a lowblow shot.

          Comment

          • Zaroku
            RIP BIg Dawg Larry & Walt
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Mar 2009
            • 53353
            • 4,761
            • 10,926
            • 389,015

            #6
            Ear biting body slamming ??

            Comment

            • SplitSecond
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Nov 2009
              • 23151
              • 1,715
              • 1,187
              • 85,044

              #7
              Originally posted by Leicesterage

              Nuh uh, don't do that.

              If you're going to call a "hip joint" shot a low blow, then you acknowledge that Crawford effectively beat Khan with a lowblow shot.
              Who cares if a shot strayed low in Crawford Vs Khan? Especially when Crawford was schooling him either way.

              Lowblows literally saved Spence vs Porter. He was getting schooled badly.

              Comment

              • Combat Talk Radio
                Banned
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • May 2015
                • 21727
                • 2,781
                • 6,368
                • 83,247

                #8
                Originally posted by SplitSecond
                Who cares if a shot strayed low in Crawford Vs Khan? Especially when Crawford was schooling him either way.

                Lowblows literally saved Spence vs Porter. He was getting schooled badly.
                Listen to yourself. You straight up did a hypocrisy response. Straight up. You justify it for Crawford in the same breath that you criticize it for Spence.

                That makes you a mark, brother.

                Comment

                • SplitSecond
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Nov 2009
                  • 23151
                  • 1,715
                  • 1,187
                  • 85,044

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Leicesterage

                  Listen to yourself. You straight up did a hypocrisy response. Straight up. You justify it for Crawford in the same breath that you criticize it for Spence.

                  That makes you a mark, brother.
                  Come back when you have multiple highlight videos of Crawford low blowing opponents.





                  [img][/img]
                  â

                  Comment

                  • Combat Talk Radio
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • May 2015
                    • 21727
                    • 2,781
                    • 6,368
                    • 83,247

                    #10
                    Originally posted by SplitSecond

                    Come back when you have multiple highlight videos of Crawford low blowing opponents.
                    Your nose is so wide open for Crawford, you're in defense mode over nothing.

                    The bottom line is, Crawford fights dirty too.


                    You ignored when he was holding and hitting Kavaliauskas.

                    You ignored the low blow on Khan.

                    You ignored the sketchy gloves knockout of Avanesyan.

                    You ignored the excessive clinches on Molina.


                    All I said was, if you're going to say that one fights dirty without calling out the other, you're a hypocrite and a mark.

                    Let's be consistent.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP