Comments Thread For: Dmitry Bivol: "Crawford Is The Most Complete Fighter Right Now"

[MONGOOSE66]

“Crawford isn’t complete”

looks like your extremely unpopular opinion proves to be wrong again lol. Bud #1

Crawford never has come out from round 1 to beat up a fighter. Theirs no need for a rematch.

[messi807]

Crawford never has come out from round 1 to beat up a fighter. Theirs no need for a rematch.

P4P #1

[Sid-Knee]

34 yo at 130 lbs = 45 in other divisons.

No, 34 at 130 is still 34 years old. Not 40.

You also didn't give the names of any fighters who would be a world champion in their second fight?

[HeadShots]

No, 34 at 130 is still 34 years old. Not 40.

You also didn't give the names of any fighters who would be a world champion in their second fight?

YDKSAB


Hopkins was a champ into his 40's
Vitali was a champ into his 40's
Foreman
etc


name a single 130 lb champ that reigned into their 40's.

[Zaroku]

Hopkins was a king no drugs or alcohol

I liked Hopkins beating up Tito and De La *****

I wanted him to rematch calzage

[Sid-Knee]

YDKSAB


Hopkins was a champ into his 40's
Vitali was a champ into his 40's
Foreman
etc


name a single 130 lb champ that reigned into their 40's.

You really have confused yourself here. You're the one who called a 34 year old fighter at 130lbs 40 years of age. Not me. But here you are asking for me to name 40 year old fighters at that weight who were still champions. What?

130 lbs isn't a weight class that has been around as long as the weight classes the fighters you named were in either. Sorry, but it isn't just boxing you DKSA. It's logic too. Wouldn't i be naming fighters who were still champion at 130lbs at the age of 34? Not 40. How you managed to get confused i don't know. Haha.

[HeadShots]

You really have confused yourself here. You're the one who called a 34 year old fighter at 130lbs 40 years of age. Not me. But here you are asking for me to name 40 year old fighters at that weight who were still champions. What?

130 lbs isn't a weight class that has been around as long as the weight classes the fighters you named were in either. Sorry, but it isn't just boxing you DKSA. It's logic too. Wouldn't i be naming fighters who were still champion at 130lbs at the age of 34? Not 40. How you managed to get confused i don't know. Haha.

the point is 130 fighters age much faster. it's already proven you idiot.


a 34 yo salido with like 50 pro fights is ancient



AND he still beat Loma's ass.

[Sid-Knee]

the point is 130 fighters age much faster. it's already proven you idiot.


a 34 yo salido with like 50 pro fights is ancient



AND he still beat Loma's ass.

There is a 34 year old Featherweight champion now with the WBA in Leigh Wood. That's a weight class smaller too. Donaire was a world champ at a smaller weight whilst being older than 34. There's plenty of fighters at 130 or smaller who have been world class and holding titles at that age or older. It doesn't mean you're done. But the facts are, Salido weight cheated and hit below the belt all night against a fighter who was having only their second pro fight. How many fighters can you name that could become a champion in only their second pro fight?

You don't beat someone's ass in a close fight where you should have had points taken and lost the fight whilst weighing much heavier than them. You'd need to do a whole lot more for it to be described as an ass beating. It's not even close.

Judging someone from their second pro fight against a world champ and claiming they're not a complete fighter is silly. You could just do that with every fighter in history who has a loss and claim it as so. That's ignorant and irrational. But as can be seen here, your logic needs a lot of help. A lot.