Boxing as a Non-Combative Martial Art ...

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BoxingArts
    Amateur
    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
    • Aug 2015
    • 10
    • 1
    • 0
    • 6,045

    #1

    Boxing as a Non-Combative Martial Art ...

    Boxing needs to be recognized as the world's premier Martial Art ... both as a Combative Art and a Non-Combative Art. That's the best way, and maybe the only way, to save boxing from disappearing altogether ...
  • Zaroku
    RIP BIg Dawg Larry & Walt
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Mar 2009
    • 53353
    • 4,761
    • 10,926
    • 389,015

    #2
    I think you know tai chi and breathing exercises

    Comment

    • RJJ-94-02=GOAT
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Oct 2017
      • 28904
      • 9,230
      • 2,039
      • 246,831

      #3
      Thurman, Andrade and Jermall Charlo would be elite non-combative boxers. They’re very proficient at not fighting.

      Comment

      • RJJ-94-02=GOAT
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Oct 2017
        • 28904
        • 9,230
        • 2,039
        • 246,831

        #4
        Rigo would be the GOAT.

        Comment

        • Silence
          Banned
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Feb 2022
          • 6054
          • 1,548
          • 231
          • 0

          #5
          Erislandy Lara would be goat then.

          I think no one wanna to see that.

          Comment

          • BoxingArts
            Amateur
            Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
            • Aug 2015
            • 10
            • 1
            • 0
            • 6,045

            #6
            Originally posted by Zaroku
            I think you know tai chi and breathing exercises
            ... (wrong) ...

            Comment

            • Zaroku
              RIP BIg Dawg Larry & Walt
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Mar 2009
              • 53353
              • 4,761
              • 10,926
              • 389,015

              #7
              Originally posted by BoxingArts

              ... (wrong) ...
              These days I’m more wrong than I’m right..

              stop being the riddler and tell us!

              Comment

              • Zaroku
                RIP BIg Dawg Larry & Walt
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Mar 2009
                • 53353
                • 4,761
                • 10,926
                • 389,015

                #8
                Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT
                Rigo would be the GOAT.
                Lmao … you drop hillarious bombs

                crawford ****ed him I’m up
                and other clowns fast!

                Comment

                • ELPacman
                  LEGENDARY
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Apr 2004
                  • 10680
                  • 1,924
                  • 148
                  • 34,372

                  #9
                  Boxing is just another combative art to go along with the many. There is no 1 perfect art. If you watch boxing, it is because you prefer this "art" over the others. Nothing wrong with that.

                  I love the MMA guys that say, yeah, but you can kick and take down. I say, "yeah, but I don't care about any of that". I prefer all standup, punch for punch type of combat. There is something about seeing "masters" of 1 art go at it than watching MMA where guys are doing back flips and all kinds of ****** stuff that looks cool when it lands, but is also luck at times. Like landing a 1 in a million, spinning, back flip, side to side, round house head kick bs. It looks wild, it is wild and it makes for great 5 second clips, but otherwise, it's a ****show if you ask me, lol.

                  I like seeing two who attempt to master their 1 craft go at it and see who can exploit who better.

                  Comment

                  • CubanGuyNYC
                    Latin From Manhattan
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Sep 2009
                    • 15414
                    • 1,678
                    • 1,706
                    • 112,127

                    #10
                    Originally posted by ELPacman
                    Boxing is just another combative art to go along with the many. There is no 1 perfect art. If you watch boxing, it is because you prefer this "art" over the others. Nothing wrong with that.

                    I love the MMA guys that say, yeah, but you can kick and take down. I say, "yeah, but I don't care about any of that". I prefer all standup, punch for punch type of combat. There is something about seeing "masters" of 1 art go at it than watching MMA where guys are doing back flips and all kinds of ****** stuff that looks cool when it lands, but is also luck at times. Like landing a 1 in a million, spinning, back flip, side to side, round house head kick bs. It looks wild, it is wild and it makes for great 5 second clips, but otherwise, it's a ****show if you ask me, lol.

                    I like seeing two who attempt to master their 1 craft go at it and see who can exploit who better.
                    It’s an age old argument, but I’m essentially in agreement. I prefer watching boxing, where it’s much more appealing to see two highly skilled combatants face off. But I like both sports. Boxing is, of course, a very effective fighting form; but for real-world combat, I think it’s pretty clear that MMA is superior.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP