Comments Thread For: Breadman on Spence-Crawford: I Wouldn't Be Surprised if Both Guys Hit The Canvas

[Rebelrbg]

You just talked a lot of garbage. Unlike you I'm not pro either fighter. I like to look at things objectively it's obvious Crawford is the more athletic, gifted fighter but being the smaller man negates some of these qualities. If you're not able to add anything constructive then keep your ****** comments to yourself

Uh, I wasn't commenting to you, you commented to me with an insult. Short memory?

[Knuckle sandwich]

I'm starting to see this fight as a draw, i will put some money on it, i feel both will cone out very cautious for the first three rounds or so, then it will become a race to the line.

[Daniel Skillman]

"I’m objective and have relationships with both teams."

This sentence encapsulates the problems I have with the Breadman. You are almost surely not objective of you have relationships with those you're supposed to be covering as a journalist.

Breaf's takes are suspect from the jump because you can't ever know if his relationships are guiding them. Is he being honest, or protecting his relationships? And is he protecting and promoting his own fighters?

I'm sorry. Maybe he's a great guy. But the conflicts of interest are too obvious to take him seriously as some kind of objective pundit. It's like reading articles by Frank Warren here. Does anybody believe he doesn't have, at the very least, mixed motives for everything he writes?

My 2 cents

[b Murphington]

"I’m objective and have relationships with both teams."

This sentence encapsulates the problems I have with the Breadman. You are almost surely not objective of you have relationships with those you're supposed to be covering as a journalist.

Breaf's takes are suspect from the jump because you can't ever know if his relationships are guiding them. Is he being honest, or protecting his relationships? And is he protecting and promoting his own fighters?

I'm sorry. Maybe he's a great guy. But the conflicts of interest are too obvious to take him seriously as some kind of objective pundit. It's like reading articles by Frank Warren here. Does anybody believe he doesn't have, at the very least, mixed motives for everything he writes?

My 2 cents

It’s interesting that he said all of that because there has been times in the past he has stated something like, “I can’t comment on that because I’ve been training him,” or something like, “I haven’t been in their camp so I can’t say this or that about them,” or he won’t go into great detail.

I think he was kind of put on the spot cuz a journalist asked him about the fight and kinda twisted his arm into giving them something to write.

[Doubledagger]

This for sure is very anticipated however, it could turn out to be a chess match with neither guy taking big chances and both being patient waiting on the other to make a mistake. I like both fighters but I’m leaning towards Spence a little only because he’s more humble and not running his dammm mouth like Crawford. I also think he’s the strongest guy Crawford will have faced coming up in weight plus pressure breaks pipes. My damm breakdown, dammm Breadman I been in the game longer and not just as a fan of fighters.

That will never happen.

Errol doesn't wait for you to make mistakes, he forces you to make them.

[archiemoore1]

I love Errol but for some reason, I keep seeing him getting stopped in 7 from a body shot just as he's throwing a punch, followed by a vicious uppercut, and finally 2 hard hooks to the jaw and the finisher behind the ear. He's going to crash to the floor hard and the parametics will have to come and revive him. I'm getting nervous because I can see it in my mind so clearly

[hitmanjosh]

That will never happen.

Errol doesn't wait for you to make mistakes, he forces you to make them.

Whatever, you just needed to say something!

[ShoulderRoll]

"I’m objective and have relationships with both teams."

This sentence encapsulates the problems I have with the Breadman. You are almost surely not objective of you have relationships with those you're supposed to be covering as a journalist.

Breaf's takes are suspect from the jump because you can't ever know if his relationships are guiding them. Is he being honest, or protecting his relationships? And is he protecting and promoting his own fighters?

I'm sorry. Maybe he's a great guy. But the conflicts of interest are too obvious to take him seriously as some kind of objective pundit. It's like reading articles by Frank Warren here. Does anybody believe he doesn't have, at the very least, mixed motives for everything he writes?

My 2 cents

That’s a fair criticism.

He always tries to find a positive spin whenever it comes to fighters trained by Virgil Hunter, Bomac, and Derrick James among others. Something he doesn’t do with, say, Canelo.

[Noelanthony]

I love Errol but for some reason, I keep seeing him getting stopped in 7 from a body shot just as he's throwing a punch, followed by a vicious uppercut, and finally 2 hard hooks to the jaw and the finisher behind the ear. He's going to crash to the floor hard and the parametics will have to come and revive him. I'm getting nervous because I can see it in my mind so clearly

That’s a vivid imagination you have there.... Crawford will be on his bike for as long as he can , he will not want a fire fight or war of attrition will Favour Spence. I can see Spence getting outboxed earlier but eventually getting to Crawford late.Crawford is going to get spanked if those feet are not moving at a rapid pace

[Hunter2015]

I just hope it isn't a snoozer like a lot of huge fights are