in ten years time no prospect could ever be an ATG

[The_Demon]

i know its a mythical list and it means very little
but the way the sport is going with guys fighting less,losses meaning a hell of a lot more and the best not necessarily fighting the best will pretty much equal the top 50 ATG list impossible too penetrate,even the top 100 will be a push.
do you agree?

[D-MiZe]

I'll take you up on that..

[Stoppage]

I don't think a fighter with less fights or less activity doesn't mean he's a possible all-time great. Look at Sugar Ray Leonard. 40 fights and many, including me, consider him an all-time great.

But yes. If you wanna be great, you have to fight the best.

[The_Demon]

I don't think a fighter with less fights or less activity doesn't mean he's a possible all-time great. Look at Sugar Ray Leonard. 40 fights and many, including me, consider him an all-time great.

But yes. If you wanna be great, you have to fight the best.

ye i get your point on the less activity
but with all the bulls*it between promoters and with more money involved (which is bound too get worse)
this will be detrimental too a guys chances of proving how great he is