Comments Thread For: Subriel Matias-Shohjahon Ergashev Mandatory Title Fight Ordered By The IBF
Collapse
-
lol no one is even talking about canelo here and you wierd ass stans obsessed like a mfer with canelo can't go a thread without mentioning him sounds like you mfers have his **** in you're mouth.. hahaahaha
I know more than you'll ever know ***** and when Matias ****s him up like the other eastern euros cats he destroyed I'll be here to remind you to take that euro **** out you're assComment
-
You could make that argument but does losing and losing badly to world class competition make you “proven”? I think almost everyone would rather see Matias fight an undefeated fighter that while “unproven”, definitely checks all the boxes. Who the phuck is MJ? To me, MJ is Michael Jordan.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Ergashev is solid. But I'm not sure he has enough to keep Matias off him. And if he decides to go to war with a guy who killed a man...Comment
-
Spence however will lose unless there is a robbery. We know all about those over there.Comment
-
It’s still my opinion that any boxing fan (not you) would rather see a solid champion (Matias) fight an untested challenger that checks all the boxes (Ergashev) than a fighter who doesn’t have much more world class experience and what he does have he lost and lost badly and obviously doesn’t have a prayers chance in hell of beating Matias (Lipinets).Last edited by just the facts; 07-02-2023, 07:31 PM.Comment
-
So losing and losing badly to world class competition makes a fighter “accomplished”? Your opinion. I have no opinion of Akmadaliev, I’ve never seen him fight. I’ve been here since 2014, why would I disappear if Ergashev loses?
It’s still my opinion that any boxing fan (not you) would rather see a solid champion (Matias) fight an untested challenger that checks all the boxes (Ergashev) than a fighter who doesn’t have much more world class experience and what he does have he lost and lost badly and obviously doesn’t have a prayers chance in hell of beating Matias (Lipinets).
Comment
-
Fact 1: Ergashev doesn’t have any experience vs world class opposition
Fact 2: Lipinets doesn’t have much more and what he does have is losses and bad losses at that
Fact 3: Ergashev checks all the boxes. Speed, defense, power, coordination. Therefore a Matias/Ergashev fight is viewed as a decent fight
Fact 4: Lipinets has never risen to the occasion vs world class competition and therefore is viewed as having little to no chance vs Matias. Nobody (except you, I guess) thinks a Matias/Lipinets is a decent fight.
Fact 5: There’s absolutely no evidence that Lipinets is a bigger puncher than Ergashev. None!
Fact 6: The who fought who, who had beat a belt holder is ridiculous. Hilarious even.
Opinion 1: you seem like you want to have arguments about dumb shyte.
Comment
Comment