Originally posted by Sid-Knee
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Subriel Matias-Shohjahon Ergashev Mandatory Title Fight Ordered By The IBF
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Regge View Post
lol no one is even talking about canelo here and you wierd ass stans obsessed like a mfer with canelo can't go a thread without mentioning him sounds like you mfers have his **** in you're mouth.. hahaahaha
I know more than you'll ever know ***** and when Matias ****s him up like the other eastern euros cats he destroyed I'll be here to remind you to take that euro **** out you're ass
Comment
-
Originally posted by just the facts View Post
You could make that argument but does losing and losing badly to world class competition make you “proven”? I think almost everyone would rather see Matias fight an undefeated fighter that while “unproven”, definitely checks all the boxes. Who the phuck is MJ? To me, MJ is Michael Jordan.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JohnnyCan View PostNobody’s chewing up and spitting out Ergashev. Have you ever seen him fight? He is a BAD man. He has been avoided by everyone for three years now. Matias may win but it won’t be a walk in the park.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rebelrbg View Post
Hilarious, what are you going to say when they win? Damn, they must really be that good.
Spence however will lose unless there is a robbery. We know all about those over there.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kannabis Kid View PostNo it's not a maybe it's the truth Lipinets is more accomplished at world level than Ergashev end of story. Akhmadaliev.
It’s still my opinion that any boxing fan (not you) would rather see a solid champion (Matias) fight an untested challenger that checks all the boxes (Ergashev) than a fighter who doesn’t have much more world class experience and what he does have he lost and lost badly and obviously doesn’t have a prayers chance in hell of beating Matias (Lipinets).Last edited by just the facts; 07-02-2023, 07:31 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by just the facts View Post
So losing and losing badly to world class competition makes a fighter “accomplished”? Your opinion. I have no opinion of Akmadaliev, I’ve never seen him fight. I’ve been here since 2014, why would I disappear if Ergashev loses?
It’s still my opinion that any boxing fan (not you) would rather see a solid champion (Matias) fight an untested challenger that checks all the boxes (Ergashev) than a fighter who doesn’t have much more world class experience and what he does have he lost and lost badly and obviously doesn’t have a prayers chance in hell of beating Matias (Lipinets).
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kannabis Kid View PostCan you name 1 fighter Ergashev has beat that has beat a former world champion? Lipinets is a bigger puncher than Ergashev is and has better accolades in multiple sports. Name 1 fighter that Ergashev has beaten that would beat Lipinets.
Fact 1: Ergashev doesn’t have any experience vs world class opposition
Fact 2: Lipinets doesn’t have much more and what he does have is losses and bad losses at that
Fact 3: Ergashev checks all the boxes. Speed, defense, power, coordination. Therefore a Matias/Ergashev fight is viewed as a decent fight
Fact 4: Lipinets has never risen to the occasion vs world class competition and therefore is viewed as having little to no chance vs Matias. Nobody (except you, I guess) thinks a Matias/Lipinets is a decent fight.
Fact 5: There’s absolutely no evidence that Lipinets is a bigger puncher than Ergashev. None!
Fact 6: The who fought who, who had beat a belt holder is ridiculous. Hilarious even.
Opinion 1: you seem like you want to have arguments about dumb shyte.
Comment
Comment