Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Subriel Matias-Shohjahon Ergashev Mandatory Title Fight Ordered By The IBF

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post

    If it wasn't, your fighters wouldn't be looking for opponents all the time being out a year or more. Look at those who were out for that long and won their fights. Nearly all lost them. Only a select few came through. But you can't keep being consistent with it. It will catch up with you.

    Do you not question why Haymon is putting Charlo and Spence out there being inactive against active opponents? It sure looks like a clear out sale to me before the contract is up. Haymon and his fighters are the ones who usually inflict this on their opponent. But all of a sudden, he has two of his fighters doing so when he's done nothing but protect them at all costs.
    Hilarious, what are you going to say when they win? Damn, they must really be that good.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Regge View Post

      lol no one is even talking about canelo here and you wierd ass stans obsessed like a mfer with canelo can't go a thread without mentioning him sounds like you mfers have his **** in you're mouth.. hahaahaha

      I know more than you'll ever know ***** and when Matias ****s him up like the other eastern euros cats he destroyed I'll be here to remind you to take that euro **** out you're ass
      Relax phaggot.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by just the facts View Post

        You could make that argument but does losing and losing badly to world class competition make you “proven”? I think almost everyone would rather see Matias fight an undefeated fighter that while “unproven”, definitely checks all the boxes. Who the phuck is MJ? To me, MJ is Michael Jordan.
        I did make that argument and it's the truth if Lipinets fought the bums Ergashev has fought he'd still be undefeated too.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Kannabis Kid View Post
          I did make that argument and it's the truth if Lipinets fought the bums Ergashev has fought he'd still be undefeated too.
          Maybe???? And who the phuck is MJ?

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by just the facts View Post

            Maybe???? And who the phuck is MJ?
            No it's not a maybe it's the truth Lipinets is more accomplished at world level than Ergashev end of story. Akhmadaliev.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by JohnnyCan View Post
              Nobody’s chewing up and spitting out Ergashev. Have you ever seen him fight? He is a BAD man. He has been avoided by everyone for three years now. Matias may win but it won’t be a walk in the park.
              Ergashev is solid. But I'm not sure he has enough to keep Matias off him. And if he decides to go to war with a guy who killed a man...

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Rebelrbg View Post

                Hilarious, what are you going to say when they win? Damn, they must really be that good.
                Charlo isn't fighting as he said the inactivity was too much. Funny that isn't it. Quite ironic considering what we're discussing.

                Spence however will lose unless there is a robbery. We know all about those over there.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Kannabis Kid View Post
                  No it's not a maybe it's the truth Lipinets is more accomplished at world level than Ergashev end of story. Akhmadaliev.
                  So losing and losing badly to world class competition makes a fighter “accomplished”? Your opinion. I have no opinion of Akmadaliev, I’ve never seen him fight. I’ve been here since 2014, why would I disappear if Ergashev loses?

                  It’s still my opinion that any boxing fan (not you) would rather see a solid champion (Matias) fight an untested challenger that checks all the boxes (Ergashev) than a fighter who doesn’t have much more world class experience and what he does have he lost and lost badly and obviously doesn’t have a prayers chance in hell of beating Matias (Lipinets).
                  Last edited by just the facts; 07-02-2023, 07:31 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by just the facts View Post

                    So losing and losing badly to world class competition makes a fighter “accomplished”? Your opinion. I have no opinion of Akmadaliev, I’ve never seen him fight. I’ve been here since 2014, why would I disappear if Ergashev loses?

                    It’s still my opinion that any boxing fan (not you) would rather see a solid champion (Matias) fight an untested challenger that checks all the boxes (Ergashev) than a fighter who doesn’t have much more world class experience and what he does have he lost and lost badly and obviously doesn’t have a prayers chance in hell of beating Matias (Lipinets).
                    Can you name 1 fighter Ergashev has beat that has beat a former world champion? Lipinets is a bigger puncher than Ergashev is and has better accolades in multiple sports. Name 1 fighter that Ergashev has beaten that would beat Lipinets.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Kannabis Kid View Post
                      Can you name 1 fighter Ergashev has beat that has beat a former world champion? Lipinets is a bigger puncher than Ergashev is and has better accolades in multiple sports. Name 1 fighter that Ergashev has beaten that would beat Lipinets.
                      You’re talking in circles trying to convince yourself of something that isn’t true. The facts are this.

                      Fact 1: Ergashev doesn’t have any experience vs world class opposition

                      Fact 2: Lipinets doesn’t have much more and what he does have is losses and bad losses at that

                      Fact 3: Ergashev checks all the boxes. Speed, defense, power, coordination. Therefore a Matias/Ergashev fight is viewed as a decent fight

                      Fact 4: Lipinets has never risen to the occasion vs world class competition and therefore is viewed as having little to no chance vs Matias. Nobody (except you, I guess) thinks a Matias/Lipinets is a decent fight.

                      Fact 5: There’s absolutely no evidence that Lipinets is a bigger puncher than Ergashev. None!

                      Fact 6: The who fought who, who had beat a belt holder is ridiculous. Hilarious even.

                      Opinion 1: you seem like you want to have arguments about dumb shyte.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP