What is the most amazing to you? (Pacquiao, Mosley, Hopkins related)

[daggum]

u mean when hopkins got skooled by calzaghe haha./
I think pacquio is the most amazing one this guy came from like 110pounds or something stupid like that and hes knockin out guys 40pounds more then him lol.

schooling a guy without even hitting him now that is impressive

[Joe2608]

You have to be biased towards B-hop to score it for him. The only score they ever give is 114-113 so it was not a robbery at all. B-hop cheated anyways and was an embarresment to the sport that night, he didn't deserve to win.

[daggum]

You have to be biased towards B-hop to score it for him. The only score they ever give is 114-113 so it was not a robbery at all. B-hop cheated anyways and was an embarresment to the sport that night, he didn't deserve to win.

either biased or knowledgeable boxing fans. defense all hopkins. clean punching all hopkins. effective agression hopkins since missing is the opposite of effective. ring generalship debatable. so once again how did calzaghe win when he only won 1 at best of the scoring criteria? hit and not be hit remember not get hit and don't hit. even the uk commentaors can be heard saying hopkins is landing the meaningful punches and they had to convince themselves that calzaghe was winning based on the magical "workrate" code word. which basically means throwing punches at the air.

[daggum]

You have to be biased towards B-hop to score it for him. The only score they ever give is 114-113 so it was not a robbery at all. B-hop cheated anyways and was an embarresment to the sport that night, he didn't deserve to win.

which guy was embarrassing again?

[bojangles1987]

What Paquiao has done the last few years is incredible. He was a super featherweight a couple years ago. In little more than a month he will be stepping in the ring with arguably the best welterweight in the world as the favorite.

[Joe2608]

which guy was embarrassing again?

Look at that clear headbutt by Hopkins in that gif. Dirty.

In response to the UK commentators thing, it works both ways. Harold Lederman only gave Hopkins 3 rounds. The majority of people had it for Calzaghe the only people i've seen who dispute it are bitter Hopkins fans who can't accept any losses for their favourite fighter bar the Roy Jones one, which they make excuses saying he was "too green" even though Roy was challenging for his first title too and was only 21-0 and ranked below Hopkins.

[The_Demon]

yea everyone ringside who scored it for hopkins must have been way off but thankfully the 2 old blind judges had it scored correctly............

i cant believe you are still bitter about that seriously
even the most die hard calzaghe haters have accepted that he won that fight

[djtmal]

I'm sitting here and thinking about the past several years in boxing and it's been pretty crazy. From Hopkins moving up to weight and winning the light heavyweight belts to Mosley beating the crap out of Margarito and then Pacquiao beating Hatton/DLh.

Which of these things was the most amazing to you?

hopkins moving up in weight to his natural weight (lightheavy) ain't amazing at all...

[Bushidō]

Bernard Hopkins beating Tarver, Pavlik and Calzaghe (IMHO).

Yeah thats what I chose too because He was a HUGE underdog vs Tarver and Pavlik. And he was doing it when he was past 40.

[Bushidō]

hopkins moving up in weight to his natural weight (lightheavy) ain't amazing at all...

So the dude fights at middleweight for his entire career (except his first fight) and moves up and you say that he was always a light heavyweight? You been listening to Emmanuel Steward too much. And not even about the weight. How bout his age and beating those guys? I'm sure you are going to say you knew he would win.