Which Mayweather fight was more boring out of these ...................

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ivansmamma
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Sep 2004
    • 4038
    • 174
    • 149
    • 18,547

    #11
    De La Hoya vs. Mayweather was okay, Oscar fought pretty good until he tired in the later third and it was nice to see Oscars pressure vs. Floyds defense in the middle rounds when it looked like Oscar could win the fight.

    Floyd vs. Marquez was okay because at first i wanted to see if Floyd had lost some during the layoff and in the later rounds it was at least impressive to see Marquez keep trying and not backing off.

    Floyd vs. Baldomir was just the most boring ever, worse than Hopkins vs. Calzaghe.

    Comment

    • baracuda
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Mar 2009
      • 10779
      • 259
      • 569
      • 11,470

      #12
      baldo then hoya......the jmm fight was not bad....

      Comment

      • Junito-Rulez
        BS's Tony Montana
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Aug 2009
        • 6095
        • 375
        • 439
        • 13,296

        #13
        Baldo fight was ******.

        Comment

        • The_Demon
          Big dog
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jan 2009
          • 13604
          • 1,354
          • 888
          • 22,971

          #14
          i take it we are not comparing too fights like taylor-spinks or wlad-ibragimov?

          Comment

          • prtyboybladeage
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Nov 2006
            • 441
            • 24
            • 95
            • 6,859

            #15
            Yea Baldomir, no competition. I didn't think it was really boring, but out of the 3 that one is definitely the only one I would call boring.

            Comment

            • Kevin Jesus
              Banned
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Apr 2009
              • 7723
              • 280
              • 514
              • 8,467

              #16
              I like all 3. The Baldomir and DLH were cases of Floyd winning under any circumstances.


              Vs De La Hoya, ring size was small which favored DLH, small gloves which favored the better puncher DLH, and the weight at 154 which def favored DLH.

              Vs Baldomir, Floyd fighting the bigger man, broke his hand mid way through the fight, and adjusted to winning with a broken right hand.

              Vs Marquez, not boring at all, i loved that fight and enjoyed with my girlfriend and homies when we saw it.

              Comment

              • RightCross94
                Banned
                • Apr 2009
                • 2899
                • 158
                • 150
                • 3,933

                #17
                DLH and Marquez werent bad, Baldomir became pretty unwatchable towards the end

                Comment

                • Syf
                  KO Artist
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Sep 2009
                  • 7574
                  • 291
                  • 191
                  • 14,978

                  #18
                  Baldomir...because Floyd was only doing just enough to win and not looking too good doing it.. due to injury

                  DLH there was a slight sense of urgency because DLH would go into those flurries and it was fun seeing how Floyd handled it. So DLH at least seemed urgent, even if Floyd didn't.

                  JMM to me was entertaining..so *shrug* Maybe it was the whole retiring and coming back thing

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  TOP