Crawford has a point. Spence win against brooke isn't much better

[satiev1]

Brooke bulked up to fight ggg and was about 175 lbs all muscle fight night. After getting his orbital broken, it was best for him to heal up and take the year off. What does he do instead? 6 months later he's fighting spence. He had to suck down back to 147 lbs and lose all that muscle while his body wasn't fully healed. 6 months was nowhere near enough time. We seen time and time again with fighters bulking up and then having to come down in weight and they weren't the same. Your body is drained after losing all that muscle mass. Some examples are jones going to hw and then sucking down to lhw and getting dropped. Other example is dawson sucking weight to get to 168 and getting dropped.

When crawford fought brooke he was already acclamated to 147 and was coming off a 3 fight winning streak where he looked great. Also the manner in which crawford wasn't a dog war like spence had with brooke. He countered him with one jab and brooke was out. Crawford's win > spence's

[PRINCEKOOL]

Spence Junior's win over Brook is miles better than Crawford's. YES Brook lost to Golovkin, but regardless it was one of his best performances.

Golovkin was at his absolute peak, and Brook was pushing him and fighting him head on.

Brook was basically for me still near enough at his peak vs Spence Junior. The determination to jump back into another big fight vs Spence Junior proved this.

Crawford is a great fighter, but at 147 pounds 'He has beaten no great fighters in top form, in my opinion'.

Porter was semi-retired, and Brook's own long time boxing coach 'Dominic Ingle, refused to train Kell Brook for the Crawford fight'.

Ingle refuse to train Brook, because he stated that 'They were not given enough time to optimally prepare for the fight'.

Brook was still a good fighter, but come on mate? Brook at that stage of his career, was coming back from injuries and his form had been better.

Crawford's win vs Brook is good. But the knock-out actually embellishes the entire performance 'Brook skill for skill was right there with Crawford. The way Brook was stopped so easily from a Jab, was most likely down to being drained at the weight. Because Brook has always had solid durability'.

Brook has since tried to avoid fights at 147 pounds 'And it is common knowledge that, he has been overly drained at the weight 147 pounds for sometime'.

To make 147 pounds, I believe Ingle wanted more time 'From experience he has been the man who trained Brook for all his biggest fights' etc.

[satiev1]

Spence Junior's win over Brook is miles better than Crawford's. YES Brook lost to Golovkin, but regardless it was one of his best performances.

Golovkin was at his absolute peak, and Brook was pushing him and fighting him head on.

Brook was basically for me still near enough at his peak vs Spence Junior. The determination to jump back into another big fight vs Spence Junior proved this.

Crawford is a great fighter, but at 147 pounds 'He has beaten no great fighters in top form, in my opinion'.

Porter was semi-retired, and Brook's own long time boxing coach 'Dominic Ingle, refused to train Kell Brook for the Crawford fight'.

Ingle refuse to train Brook, because he stated that 'They were not given enough time to optimally prepare for the fight'.

Brook was still a good fighter, but come on mate? Brook at that stage of his career, was coming back from injuries and his form had been better.

Crawford's win vs Brook is good. But the knock-out actually embellishes the entire performance 'Brook skill for skill was right there with Crawford. The way Brook was stopped so easily from a Jab, was most likely down to being drained at the weight. Because Brook has always had solid durability'.

Brook has since tried to avoid fights at 147 pounds 'And it is common knowledge that, he has been overly drained at the weight 147 pounds for sometime'.

To make 147 pounds, I believe Ingle wanted more time 'From experience he has been the man who trained Brook for all his biggest fights' etc.

You haven't disputed any of my points. And your saying brooke had no time to prepare for crawford? He had no time to prepare for spence losing all that muscle within months. LMAO how was he drained? The fight happened years after the ggg loss and he already had 4 bouts at at 147. He was drained for the spence fight. He fought spence 6 months after bulking up to 170 lbs fight night to fight ggg.

[PRINCEKOOL]

You haven't disputed any of my points. And your saying brooke had no time to prepare for crawford? He had no time to prepare for spence losing all that muscle within months. LMAO how was he drained? The fight happened years after the ggg loss and he already had 4 bouts at at 147. He was drained for the spence fight. He fought spence 6 months after bulking up to 170 lbs fight night to fight ggg.

You have made no real valid points. It is common knowledge, UNIVERSAL shared opinion in boxing 'That Kell Brook was in miles better condition for Spence Junior'.

Kell Brook has stated this, and so has his long time trainer Dominic Ingle 'And that is why Ingle has actually been backing Spence Junior to beat Crawford'.

If you have watched Kell Brook's career, which I don't really think you have 'You would know that, Brook would not need to bulk up to 160 pounds'.

Kell Brook outside the ring and still in good condition, walked about way above the 147 pound limit 'Brook has been making the 147 limit, even before he was professional'.

Crawford has not beaten no real top level 147 fighters in great form 'Porter was semi-retied, Brook was coming back from his own issues and not even being trained by his long time trainer Dominic Ingle' etc.