If crawford beats spence and charlo he surpasses floyd not even a debate

[dibzvincent143]

He would be a 3 time undisputed champ in 3 divisions. And make him champ in 4 weight classes. Floyd cherry picked his opponents at the right times. And never pushed for undisputed. Beating a prime spence would be a better win than any win of a prime fighter that mayweather beat.

Crawford would then have a better win against a great prime fighter than Floyd’s. Floyd’s best win against an absolute prime fighter remains to be Corrales imo.

With that said, I think Floyd’s resume is still way deeper.. and on paper (lol) they’re goatish material if we are not going to dissect it.

While Crawford’s resume both on paper and not cannot match, and head to head Floyd beats Crawford as well.

[The D3vil]

IT would make Crawford's resume better at the top end, for sure.

Most of Floyd's best wins were guys who were past their primes, before their primes, or out of their natural weight class.

Floyd's resume is wayyyy deeper, though.

I will say in Crawford's defense, that because he wasn't a cash cow fighter, he couldn't fight whoever he wanted like Floyd & Canelo, who have the pick of the litter for whoever they want to fight when they want to fight them most of the time, so I don't hold that against Bud.

[EmpiresBoxing]

Crawford don't have any gift wins IMHO he already surpass mayweather.

[BoZz]

He would be a 3 time undisputed champ in 3 divisions. And make him champ in 4 weight classes. Floyd cherry picked his opponents at the right times. And never pushed for undisputed. Beating a prime spence would be a better win than any win of a prime fighter that mayweather beat.

Floyd's wins over gatti and hatton just to name a couple mean more than crawfords whole resume, who did he beat/fight? Not one solid champion on his resume, he got smashed by some Lithuanian dude who's name we don't even know without checking boxrec first. If he beats Spence he'll get some respect but even with that win it won't be anywhere near as good as Floyd's resume.

[_original_]

Pull up each others top 10 wins side by side for a good laugh. Bud has a such a terrible resume for a so called P4P #1 guy.

[djtmal]

He trumps Floyd at welterweight definitely if he beats Spence. Floyd’s best win there is Ricky Hatton. Spence is far more accomplished than Hatton at welterweight.

[satiev1]

floyd's wins over gatti and hatton just to name a couple mean more than crawfords whole resume, who did he beat/fight? Not one solid champion on his resume, he got smashed by some lithuanian dude who's name we don't even know without checking boxrec first. If he beats spence he'll get some respect but even with that win it won't be anywhere near as good as floyd's resume.

porter and brooke would both wipe the floor with hatton and gatti lmao. GATTI WAS A GLORIFIED PUNCHING BAG JOURNEYMAN.

[BoZz]

porter and brooke would both wipe the floor with hatton and gatti lmao. GATTI WAS A GLORIFIED PUNCHING BAG JOURNEYMAN.

Was Cotto a punching bag too or a Pacquiao or a Cotto? Or a prime Maidana? Most of them future HOF fighters. And here you are mentioning those two clowns lol Kell Brook was never the same man after Spence was done with him, respect to him for taking the fight but he received so much damage that Crawford fought a shell. Porter was done a long time ago and he had no 'dog' in him when he fought crawford, I thought the man threw the fight to be honest, talked himself up but on fight night he showed nothing and he was way past his prime too. So those are the only two names Crawford has fought, who else lol? Floyd toyed with Canelo's ginger ass even tho he was nearly 40..he beat a prime Cotto too. Crawford hasn't fought anyone even the one's you mentioned weren't in their so called prime and were already damaged goods. Boy take a seat and stop talking about boxing because you have no fkn clue haha

[hugh grant]

To be fair I think bud beats everyone floyd beat. But resume not quite as strong that's the problem. But best spence and Charlotte or whoever then we've got the momentum going

[davef]

Funny thread I would add that Floyd's win against Cotto at 154 is way more significant than any Crawford win vs Charlo its not even up for debate and some of these claims Floyd beat guys not in their prime did you forget Floyd was around the same age as Crawford now when he beat Pac and Nelo?

Some people need to let their hatred of Floyd go the man's retired doing ****** exhibitions for ****** amounts of money and he had a great career retired undefeated