Does the winner of the Super 6 instantly become P4P#1

[mindreader]

Discuss Why or why not?

[Khalid X]

no...because contrary to what people believe, this tourney doesn't determine the clear #1 guy at 168. If Lucian Bute beats Andrade like I think he will and beats another top guy, then you can make the argument for him being the best at 168.

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

Not the best P4P,, but the best SMW? Yes

[Khalid X]

Its kinda like this...say you have a super 6 at 147 which includes Mosley, Pwilliams, Mayweather, Berto, Hatton, Pacquiao....You cant say the guy is the clear #1 guy at WW, because it didn't include Cotto or Margarito.

Bute is a very solid champ at 168 and Andrade and Kalzab (sp) are other top fighters not in this. Super 6 winner is still not the clear cut #1 guy at 168 when you still have other great champs and top contenders out there.

[mindreader]

But the winner is going to have a better resume than what mayweather has been doing recently.

[FLY TY]

Discuss Why or why not?

Not the best P4P,, but the best SMW? Yes

i don't think it does either.....isn't the tournament based on points? basically you could lose a fight, and still win the tourney? or am i wrong?

[-GR -]

But the winner is going to have a better resume than what mayweather has been doing recently.

Shut the **** up. Yeah the legacies are going to be made by the amazing Andre Dirrell
1

[MANGLER]

Um, how about no?

[Shadows]

Top 10? Sure, why not?

Numero uno? Nope.

[-Antonio-]

Whoever makes it out of that tourny should definitely get some p4p top 10 consideration.