Super Six COMPLETE Predictions [Post Yours]

[Glamour Puss]

Alright then give me a bit and I'll watch the video and reply to you. Playing Tekken at the mo :P

Quit playing tekken all the time and start playing me in fn 4!!!

[starjammer]

i debated everyone who claims dirrell won and ive won every debate because when the facts are thrown at them they bottle it..

for example heres a video of the first 4 rounds...

dirrell barely gets a draw in my eyes in any of them...please show me otherwise how dirrell lands anything...good luck...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATrAh...x=0&playnext=1

Alright then.

Round 1: Both fighters feeling eachother out. Froch wins the round by landing more jabs.

Round 2: Some jabs to the chest, body and glancing face by both fighters. I have Dirrell landing only two or three more jabs. But the short counter left on the inside when Froch leaps with his own left hook gives Dirrell the round.

Round 3: Round starts with a glancing straight left for Dirrell, barely grazing Froch. Jab from Froch. Jab from Dirrell, followed by short thump on inside to side of head. Froch lands glancing shots to Dirrell's chest.

Shot to the chest from Dirrell. Shot from Dirrell when against the ropes. Froch responds with a lunging, landing straight. Jabs to the body. Wide counter right hook from Dirrell.

I give the round to Dirrell for landing more.

Round 4: Meaningful straight lefts from Dirrell are blocked by Froch. A jab from Froch is countered by a left hook and a straight right from Dirrell. Two jabs land from Dirrell. Another jab grazes for Dirrell. A light hook from a jab lands for Froch. Good jab from Froch.

Jab from Froch again, but Dirrell counters with a straight right. Glancing body shot from Froch. Jab from Froch. Good jab from Dirrell. Jab for Froch again. Froch tries a combo with Dirrell on the ropes but Dirrell makes him miss.

Carl outjabs Dirrell this round by 1 or 2 jabs, but Dirrell has landed a nice counter left and two straight right hands. Froch's best punch is a light left-hook and a glancing body shot.

I give Dirrell the round.

____________________

I guess you see it completley differently. And thats why boxing fans have seen two different fights, we're all looking for different things.

[starjammer]

Quit playing tekken all the time and start playing me in fn 4!!!

This Tekken universe needs to be saved Jack. I came back on last night before the Kessler Ward fight but you were gone! Damn

[slimshandy69]

Alright then.

Round 1: Both fighters feeling eachother out. Froch wins the round by landing more jabs.

Round 2: Some jabs to the chest, body and glancing face by both fighters. I have Dirrell landing only two or three more jabs. But the short counter left on the inside when Froch leaps with his own left hook gives Dirrell the round.

Round 3: Round starts with a glancing straight left for Dirrell, barely grazing Froch. Jab from Froch. Jab from Dirrell, followed by short thump on inside to side of head. Froch lands glancing shots to Dirrell's chest.

Shot to the chest from Dirrell. Shot from Dirrell when against the ropes. Froch responds with a lunging, landing straight. Jabs to the body. Wide counter right hook from Dirrell.

I give the round to Dirrell for landing more.

Round 4: Meaningful straight lefts from Dirrell are blocked by Froch. A jab from Froch is countered by a left hook and a straight right from Dirrell. Two jabs land from Dirrell. Another jab grazes for Dirrell. A light hook from a jab lands for Froch. Good jab from Froch.

Jab from Froch again, but Dirrell counters with a straight right. Glancing body shot from Froch. Jab from Froch. Good jab from Dirrell. Jab for Froch again. Froch tries a combo with Dirrell on the ropes but Dirrell makes him miss.

Carl outjabs Dirrell this round by 1 or 2 jabs, but Dirrell has landed a nice counter left and two straight right hands. Froch's best punch is a light left-hook and a glancing body shot.

I give Dirrell the round.

____________________

I guess you see it completley differently. And thats why boxing fans have seen two different fights, we're all looking for different things.

no you are making things up...these jabs dirrells landing wtf are you on???hes not even throwing jabs let alone landing them...froch although fainting alot is throwing alot of jabs..and connecting hence why dirrell is bloodied after 4 rounds..and froch is not even grazed...


Round 3 is aload of bollow, froch lands by far the best shot..controls the ring..dirrell literally does **** all..

round 2 froch body worl is far better and gain lands better jabs...dirrells not even throwing so those punches you are making up must a wet dream...

Seriously you need to get your eyes and braintested....

now **** off you ugly ****er...

you know nothing about boxing...ou areliterally making up imaginary punches thrown by dirrell...


watch round 8...please tell me how many illegal hold dirrell does after the left hook..you know he should have been deducted a point in that round as well...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XhU0K...2EF0AB&index=3

[slimshandy69]

and dont even dare give round 9 to dirrell even the commentators say "theres a littel swelling under dirrells right eye"

trust me im glad your not a judge you woulod have robbed froch...

[starjammer]

no you are making things up...these jabs dirrells landing wtf are you on???hes not even throwing jabs let alone landing them...froch although fainting alot is throwing alot of jabs..and connecting hence why dirrell is bloodied after 4 rounds..and froch is not even grazed...


Round 3 is aload of bollow, froch lands by far the best shot..controls the ring..dirrell literally does **** all..

round 2 froch body worl is far better and gain lands better jabs...dirrells not even throwing so those punches you are making up must a wet dream...

Seriously you need to get your eyes and braintested....

now **** off you ugly ****er...

you know nothing about boxing...ou areliterally making up imaginary punches thrown by dirrell...


watch round 8...please tell me how many illegal hold dirrell does after the left hook..you know he should have been deducted a point in that round as well...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XhU0K...2EF0AB&index=3

Lmao. You are just a comedian. Dirrell didn't land any counter shots? lmao...go back down your hole, troll.

You asked for my assessment, and I gave it to you. Not my fault you can't take it.

You are too far up Froch's ass you can't see what Dirrell done during the fight. An unbiasd fan can see both.

You need to watch the fight again and see the punches that landed.

See how you are getting so mad that you resort to insults and childish tantrums...that shows me you are blindly devouted to your man, Carl Froch. You cannot judge the fight fairly under your conditions.

[slimshandy69]

Lmao. You are just a comedian. Dirrell didn't land any counter shots? lmao...go back down your hole, troll.

You asked for my assessment, and I gave it to you. Not my fault you can't take it.

You are too far up Froch's ass you can't see what Dirrell done during the fight. An unbiasd fan can see both.

You need to watch the fight again and see the punches that landed.

See how you are getting so mad that you resort to insults and childish tantrums...that shows me you are blindly devouted to your man, Carl Froch. You cannot judge the fight fairly under your conditions.

lmao at how much you are seething because i exposed you for making up imaginary punches...the fact that you are saying froch outjabbed dirrell but gave the round to dirrell shows you deserve to be sterilized..

the fact that this yank here..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxWNh7QjoKo

boxing scene, ea5t5ideboxing, allan green, dan rafael, graham houston, jimmy iowa, the RINGSIDE PRESS, and even gary shaw admitted dirrell didnt do enough shows that i am winning this debate...

The fact that the pundits admitted froch bloodied dirrell nose and lips after 4 rounds and swelled his eye after just 8, and that froch was unmakred after 12 again shows i won...

Stop seething...admit i was right and **** off..

[Shadows]

slimshandy69 must be Rachael Cordingley.

I can't think of anybody else who'd have Froch's nuts that far down their throat.

[starjammer]

slimshandy69 must be Rachael Cordingley.

I can't think of anybody else who'd have Froch's nuts that far down their throat.

lmao. I hope Carl pays him well.

You will never win ur 'debate' Mr Shandy, because you have failed to change my opinion and the countless people who thought Dirrell won.

You ignore blatant evidence, and Dirrell's punches. I told you Dirrell's counters won the rounds. A jab is worth more than an actual punch or counter in your mind? Ok then...

The way you behave and ignore evidence, really you have no case or argument. You destroy your own argument.

You should re-group and re-strategise and try come back with a little manners and unbias. Then maybe you will be able to engage in a debate without throwing a tantrum. Just a tip for you.

[slimshandy69]

slimshandy69 must be Rachael Cordingley.

I can't think of anybody else who'd have Froch's nuts that far down their throat.

but i always win the debates...because i state facts..

I dont ay dumb things like that starjammer "froch outjabbed dirrell" then give a roud to dirrell...

Plus i dont make punches up...dirrells least effect punch was his jab..he barely threw them and when he did it was air he was punching yet according to bul**** seething starjamer it was his best weapon...

THe guy should find work that involves regularly playing on a motorway...