Comments Thread For: Bomac Backs Crawford For 'Top Five Pound For Pound Best Ever' If He Beats Spence, Charlo

[El_Mero]

Mero, stop snorting that powder. It is messing with what ever you have up top. Seriously, every single person on this planet that has sense and some knowledge about boxing and it's history, is laughing at you.

We talkin what ifs...but weirdos love to hate.
That potential accomplishment is nothin to sniff at kid. Hell, 2x undisputed in 2 diff divisions, while becoming a 3x lineal champ in diff divisions ****s all over your current favorite boxers accomplishments.

Name something similar or close to.

Your hate blinds you and thats ok. Immaturity will do that.

[EmpiresBoxing]

Hatin is bad for your health. And I'm allergic to ignorance

I'm not hating mate just telling the truth.

[El_Mero]

I'm not hating mate just telling the truth.

What truth? Name a better accomplishment? Whos your fave boxer? Whats their best accomplishment?

[EmpiresBoxing]

What truth? Name a better accomplishment? Whos your fave boxer? Whats their best accomplishment?

What's crawford resume who has he beaten? (all garbage boxer)

[El_Mero]

What's crawford resume who has he beaten? (all garbage boxer)

Deflection is a haters response, go figure. Good day

[MulaKO]

What's crawford resume who has he beaten? (all garbage boxer)

The same way Haney was going to decapitate Loma

Gtfoh

[EmpiresBoxing]

Deflection is a haters response, go figure. Good day

Have a good day too noob.

[FaustoGeraci]

Your dumb ass has comprehension issues.... YOU are the one who considers Spence as Crawford's top 5 qualifying fight.... I said if Crawford accomplishes the feet of becoming a 3x undisputed champ, it makes him with THE STRONGEST argument possible of being top 5 all time.... Spence and Charlo just so happen to be the fighters he would have to beat....

I don't give a damn about Spence's resume....HE HAS THE BELTS thus, if he is to lose to Crawford....Crawford becomes UNDISPUTED..... Same situation with Charlo at 154......

Does that help your dumb ass understand my point or is this still too many words for you?

If you think Crawford winning undisputed at 147 and 154 makes him top 5 of all time you're the clueless one. That's an absolute joke.

[Nash out]

Great fighter but the fact that he had to cheat to beat Khan, and in fact, he should have been DQ'd, so that's 1 loss in Nash's eyes, has to be held against him. Khan was coming on very strong and was going to win by TKO somewhere between 8 and 10, so Crawford resorted to cheating. Disgraceful ref as well and Khan was robbed of a great win.

Had Crawford took the rematch and beat Khan fairly, then you could look past this, but he didn't. Mayweather's one black mark was also when he ducked Khan, despite Khan winning the vote, he instead opted to fight Khan's leftovers Maidana. Nash out

[Str8.2.Da.Point]

Come on man. I rate Bud very highly but you don’t make any all-time lists with his resume. It’s who you beat and when, not who we think you’d beat in a hypothetical match up.

Who can you name that Parnell Whitaker beat without a google search....... What about Winky Wright. Name the biggest wins of Marvelous Marvin Hagler without bringing up his match ups with Hearns, Sugar, & Duran.....

Name Sugar Ray Robinson's opponents......Joe Louis.... etc......

Let's make it easy.... Floyd beat 26 title holders during his career...... How many can you name without a Google search?

I shouldn't have to point out that all these questions should be treated as rhetorical because 9x out of 10, people will use a Google search to answer them but claim they know them. I can careless about someone trying to prove they didn't when I know they did. The point I'm making is that Hall of Fame is based on ACCOMPLISHMENTS not on whether American boxing fans recognize, support, and/or respect the names on someone's resume.

Crawford has had 16 world title fights....of those opponents, 11 of them have held a world title during their pro career. 1 of them were ranked by The Ring & ESPN as a top 5 p4p fighter during the time Crawford face him (Gamboa). Obviously people don't know what a LINEAL Champion is in this sport. Because if you did, I need you to explain how Crawford can carry that title in 2 different divisions.......yet, you still don't respect his body of work. And the funny thing is......You will respect the hell out of individuals who haven't accomplished half of what Crawford has...........

I'll never understand a man who hates another man so much yet has never cross paths with him. Crawford gets ridicule and has his chin questioned because Gamboa and Kavaliauskas hit him with a clean shot (ignore the fact Crawford dropped both of them multiple times afterwards and stopped them).............But then you have a guy like Shawn Porter who had been dropped 4x, one of them by Adrien Broner who is NOT known for his power...... Yet, he gets the label of a "dog" and "he comes to fight"..........