Comments Thread For: Bellew Confident Haye Would Have Beaten Fury Had Their Fight Happened

[ThunderFists]

i remember watching adonis stevenson snapping tony bellend's head back several times before making him doing the chicken dance...one of the most gratifying things i witnessed in boxing

[Casualfanboy]

This guy never misses a chance to look completely ******.

[petero]

Fury had Haye so rattled he did the old WWE razor cut above the eye and got out of it. Watch the press conferences and check out the cut photo.

[Casualfanboy]

Tyson Fury is and has always been a technically unrefined, clumsy Heavyweight.

If you watch his fights at top level, there will always be moments of complete calamity.

That is why he has been decked many times, and busted up real good 'Even though outside of Kiltschko & Wilder, he has predominately fought at domestic to high end European level'.

At the time of Haye vs Fury, the universal perception of Fury was? That he was a game aggressive, but incredibly clumsy super Heavyweight 'He gives it a go in most area's'. And that is what his performances from those times displayed.

Stylistically for me that version of David Haye, could of beaten Fury. Peter Fury was the coach who refined Fury's game, and improved his defense 'But at that stage of Fury's career, I don't think his overall game was refined enough to beat David Haye'.

Note: Tyson Fury is still technically unrefined, and I do think he is error prone. But what makes him a great fighter, is that Tyson Fury is a complete fighter 'In the sense that he can fight in all area's. He may not be super great in all area's, but he gives it a go etc'.

Isn’t Haye the same guy who had no idea what to do against Klitschko and then cried about his sore piggy?(toe).

[Casualfanboy]

What makes fury unbeatable , the fact he doesn't fight fighters in forms and only picks fighter that are done or the fact he's a clumsy giant , I'm so sick of hearing this , he is so beat le just a fight a boxer in form that's good

Fortunately he has plenty of “done” fighter to beat that have belts. He was also cherry picked himself for being a done fighter.

[PRINCEKOOL]

Isn’t Haye the same guy who had no idea what to do against Klitschko and then cried about his sore piggy?(toe).

Haye fought a peak Kiltschko, and although he was beaten? He was by no means beaten up 'Kiltschko just edged the rounds, with his Jab'.

Haye's loss vs Kiltschko is overrated.

David Haye actually fought a by far better version of Kiltschko than Tyson Fury.

But that fight when debating the actual fight between Fury & Haye is irrelevant 'As Fury fought Kiltschko many years later'.

I have said what I have said, stylistically I believe David Haye would of beaten that version of Tyson Fury back in 2013.

Fury was getting ****** about by Steve USS Cunningham in 2013 'Haye is a superior fighter to Cunningham in every single area'.

Even if people attempt to object that statement of mine. David Haye's resume and achievements prove my statement 'Haye was on the sly the undisputed Cruiser-weight World Champion, he was a by far superior Cruiser weight and overall fighter than USS Cunningham'.

Note: Even if Haye would of beaten Tyson Fury in 2013, I would of expected Fury to put in a good effort 'And leave that fight with increased prestige as a fighter'. But back in 2013, I could of definitely envisioned Haye decking Fury multiple times 'Fury was just simply too clumsy and unrefined during that stage of his career' etc.

[just the facts]

No version of David Haye beats any version of Tyson Fury. It’s just that simple.

[Noelanthony]

You can't really blame your girl for that Noel.

It's like comparing a succulent ribeye steak to an overcooked slice of gammon.

Haye is not that bad he will give me a run for my money in the ladies department

[paulf]

Fury wasn't as refined yet, and Haye was coming off his win over Chisora and still had something left in the tank.

It would have been a good fight - anyone claiming it obviously would have gone one way or the other is delusional.