Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Ryan Garcia: I Thought I Had [Davis] Pretty Hurt In 2nd Round; I Got Impatient & Got Caught

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by Bronx2245 View Post
    Bernard Hopkins Explains Why No Show For Ryan Garcia Post-Fight Press Conference

    ​Bernard Hopkins says he and Oscar De La Hoya chose not to stand with Ryan Garcia at the post-fight press conference because they didn’t want to make it a “circus” after his loss to Gervonta ‘Tank’ Davis last Saturday night at the T-Mobile Arena in Las Vegas.

    Boxing fans on social media have criticized De La Hoya & Hopkins for not with Ryan during the post-fight press conference. They feel that they abandoned him.

    Hopkins states that Golden Boy president Eric Gomez was by Ryan’s side during the press conference, so he and Oscar weren’t needed. Bernard says he didn’t want to make it a “s**t show” by being there because the fight had no controversy, and the outcome was clear.

    “First of all, we had Eric Gomez, the president of Golden Boy, and second it wasn’t going to be about Oscar and Bernard Hopkins,” said Bernard Hopkins to Fighthype on why he and Oscar De La Hoya didn’t attend Ryan Garcia’s post-fight press conference last Saturday night after his loss to Gervonta Davis...

    https://www.boxing247.com/boxing-new...ference/262207

    Oscar probably didn't want the media referencing Ryan losing to Tank, the way Oscar lost to B-Hop! ​
    Thought Oscar's life was threatened?

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by megas30 View Post

      Thought Oscar's life was threatened?
      That's what Oscar said, but I don't trust Oscar.

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by Bronx2245 View Post
        That's what Oscar said, but I don't trust Oscar.
        That's what I am thinking. Why lie like that, unless you truly are a pos. Hopkins gave a more down to earth excuse.
        Bronx2245 Bronx2245 likes this.

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post

          You'd like to see my scores AND scorecards? What, they're different in some way to you?

          Where did i say these people had it scored for Loma clearly or otherwise? Can you not read? Not surprising considering what you've written is just out and out madness. No, what i said is, they didn't score it for Teo as wide as the judges had it. They may have edged it to Teo, but they certainly didn't have the same scores as the judges. Only corruption could have it that disgustingly bad.

          I'll just copy and paste the questions again that you haven't answered. Maybe you'll get round to it next time.

          Tell me how a draw with Commey is better than a dominant win over Pedraza? You still haven't answered. Then tell me how the Loma "Win" for Teo has aged badly like you claimed? Then tell me how Loma could have refused to give Haney a shot at the WBC title for 2 years when Loma dropped the WBC title less than two months after winning the vacant title against Luke Campbell?
          Teo win over bumchenko aged badly cause two immiediatly lost to kambumsauce who in turn got dominated twice by haney. So right there u have 3 fighters that are already ranked ahead loma. Kambumsauce, haney, teo. Also since then loma had a tough time with jamaine ortiz who isn’t even highly ranked. Loma never dropped any titles he was gifted franchise status. And got embarrassed on espn by teofimo who just isn’t as good as we thought. If u think Teo would by princess Ry I don’t know what to tell u lol. 2 years ago I would’ve have agreed. But I’m not dumb. Seeing Teo as he is Ryan garcia beating him is easy money. Ur hero bumchenko is gonna get embarrassed when he fights haney worse than when he fought Teo. Only an idiot thinks a guy who lost to old balls salido(dirty or not is no excuse salido is FAR from elite) could hold a candle to stank at this point. Maybe 2-3 years ago u might have had a point. But times change and lomachencko is WELL past it he has so many miles on his clock to think he can beat the young lions now is laughable. He couldn’t even beat a mentally weak af teofimo lmao

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by LAchargers373 View Post

            Teo win over bumchenko aged badly cause two immiediatly lost to kambumsauce who in turn got dominated twice by haney. So right there u have 3 fighters that are already ranked ahead loma. Kambumsauce, haney, teo. Also since then loma had a tough time with jamaine ortiz who isn’t even highly ranked. Loma never dropped any titles he was gifted franchise status. And got embarrassed on espn by teofimo who just isn’t as good as we thought. If u think Teo would by princess Ry I don’t know what to tell u lol. 2 years ago I would’ve have agreed. But I’m not dumb. Seeing Teo as he is Ryan garcia beating him is easy money. Ur hero bumchenko is gonna get embarrassed when he fights haney worse than when he fought Teo. Only an idiot thinks a guy who lost to old balls salido(dirty or not is no excuse salido is FAR from elite) could hold a candle to stank at this point. Maybe 2-3 years ago u might have had a point. But times change and lomachencko is WELL past it he has so many miles on his clock to think he can beat the young lions now is laughable. He couldn’t even beat a mentally weak af teofimo lmao
            reading this poo makes me think you are either 8 years old or not too "developed"

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post

              Where am i lying?

              Loma didn't refuse anything for two years. Arum got the franchise belt pretty quickly to shut out Haney getting his chance. It had nothing to do with Loma. Besides, Loma was busy getting the unification on with Teo that everyone was calling for. Loma couldn't fight both at the same time.

              You've just pulled that nonsense out of your arse. 90% didn't see a clear win for Teo. Show me where? If you had it as wide as it was scored, you can add scoring to your resume of things your completely terrible at.

              Triangular theories don't work. Surly you've gotten that by now? Actually, what am i on about. You think a draw is better than a win. But to say Loma isn't top 5. Haha. Yeah, sure. Ryan would take a position over him after doing absolutely nothing. Forget Loma has a better resume than all of them combined at just LW. Forget his other wins at the lower weights. But ask Tank how good Loma is. He hasn't ducked for years for nothing. Even when Floyd threatened Tank with making it, Tank replied "You're just trying to get me beat".

              Are you saying Salido didn't come in well over weight and hit low all night without getting any points taken? That isn't an excuse. It's a fact. It was so close that a deserved point deduction would have won Loma the fight. I don' care about the madness you come out with. But to say he's a bum? What? Salido has two wins over an undefeated Lopez that is better than Ryan and Tank's resume combined. Then you add in the fact it was only the second pro fight for Loma.

              You think a really bad opinion is an "Undisputed fact"? Yeah, it isn't. Haney is the best at the weight until proven otherwise. He's another fighter Tank has ducked. He's had the chance to fight him but he too was turned down. Remember what he said. "I don't need the titles". If you want to be the best, then yes, you do. Worthless regular titles isn't going to do it. Well, for intelligent people it's not.

              Golovkin didn't lose to Canelo twice. Golovkin beat Canelo in the first two fights. Canelo then waited years for the third fight as the years he waited for the other two wasn't good enough as he thought with him hoping the aging would help him win. It didn't, he lost and needed his corrupt judges both times.

              Like just read ur post man lmao. “Golovkin didn’t lose to canelo twice” yes he did. I can back that up with evidence and facts ur just pouching non sensical opinions lmao. If golovkin beat canelo…he would have beat canelo lol. Even golovkin down trainer felt canelo won the 2nd fight the only people who think otherwise are dumb fan boys lol u sound crazy

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by eco1 View Post

                reading this poo makes me think you are either 8 years old or not too "developed"
                Developed doesn’t need quotations try to keep up. The only under developed thing in this thread is your brain take a reading class lol

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by LAchargers373 View Post

                  Teo win over bumchenko aged badly cause two immiediatly lost to kambumsauce who in turn got dominated twice by haney. So right there u have 3 fighters that are already ranked ahead loma. Kambumsauce, haney, teo. Also since then loma had a tough time with jamaine ortiz who isn’t even highly ranked. Loma never dropped any titles he was gifted franchise status. And got embarrassed on espn by teofimo who just isn’t as good as we thought. If u think Teo would by princess Ry I don’t know what to tell u lol. 2 years ago I would’ve have agreed. But I’m not dumb. Seeing Teo as he is Ryan garcia beating him is easy money. Ur hero bumchenko is gonna get embarrassed when he fights haney worse than when he fought Teo. Only an idiot thinks a guy who lost to old balls salido(dirty or not is no excuse salido is FAR from elite) could hold a candle to stank at this point. Maybe 2-3 years ago u might have had a point. But times change and lomachencko is WELL past it he has so many miles on his clock to think he can beat the young lions now is laughable. He couldn’t even beat a mentally weak af teofimo lmao
                  The Loma win aged badly, not because Loma went on to lose to other fighters after or look bad. But because Teo lost to Kambosas? You really have no idea what the term "That win aged badly" means do you? Clearly. You're not even on the right page. hell, you're not even on the same book.

                  Loma had a tough fight with Ortiz for the reasons i've already pointed out. His performances against Commey and Nakatani were on point for obvious reasons. Not obvious to you. But obvious to people with sense.

                  Ryan Garcia was trailing a Luke Campbell who had been out of the ring for 17 months, was coming off a loss, and had caught covid in that time. Had that been a Campbell in peak form he would have done a lot more than drop Ryan. He would have ended him. So talk to me about bad performances when there's valid reasons for the tough time Loma had and not one for Ryan under such conditions. Your hypocrisy, contradictions and all out madness is all over the place. You make no sense what-so-ever.

                  You believe a Tank, Ryan or Haney could fight a world champion in their second pro fight equal to Salido in their own weight classes and come out the victor, even though that opponent came in way over weight and cheated all night with low blows? They could make it as close as Loma did? That had a point been taken off for the illegal tactics, they would have got the decision? Yeah, no they wouldn't. Not even close. Hell, they wouldn't beat an opponent equivalent to Salido under those conditions even now. Let alone in their second pro fight.

                  Who argued that Loma would beat Tank now he's past his best? Sorry, but you've made up another argument in your head. The point was who had the better resumes. But as you can see, you're too ****** to follow simple points and stay on topic.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by LAchargers373 View Post

                    Developed doesn’t need quotations try to keep up. The only under developed thing in this thread is your brain take a reading class lol
                    You shouldn't be telling people to take a reading class being this ******. It's just too ironic.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by LAchargers373 View Post

                      Like just read ur post man lmao. “Golovkin didn’t lose to canelo twice” yes he did. I can back that up with evidence and facts ur just pouching non sensical opinions lmao. If golovkin beat canelo…he would have beat canelo lol. Even golovkin down trainer felt canelo won the 2nd fight the only people who think otherwise are dumb fan boys lol u sound crazy
                      You've just read the post even though you've already responded to it the other day? Haha. Thanks for the comedy gold.

                      Yes, Golovkin beat Canelo in fights 1 and 2. The reason Golovkin didn't get the decision either time is, Canelo has the most corrupt set-up in world boxing. The dude got a draw in the Mayweather fight where he was dominated. He lost the Bivol fight by 2 points according to his judges. He won the Lara fight even though he lost that too.

                      As if thinking the score cards that come back are actual facts and could never be corrupt scoring because robberies cannot exist. Haha.

                      Man, you do ****** to an expert level. Seriously.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP