There's a chance that we can see a 150-0 fighter in the near future.

[Boxing 112]

It's a serious post. if a thailander who don't even cherry pick his opponent become 54-0 what if he keep fighting a non threat opponent he will easily reach 75-0 record.

You said 150 so the post was just taking the p***

[BodyBagz]

never heard of google?

https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/boxin...rd-thai-boxer/

I hope it wasn't too painful

I just loathe having to be the one to find SOMEONE ELSE'S proof

I'm shocked it only took me 3 tries to get this ''little known'' info !!!

Ok...so he beat up a bunch of food vendors and street sweepers
Am I supposed to be impressed or piss my pants in laughter ?

[BodyBagz]

Shame Pac wasn't qualified to be compared to that unknown legend

[KillaCamNZ]

Won't happen. You'd need an elite guy to fight 150 cans just to be sure of it, and an elite guy isn't going to fight 150 cans. He'll be gunning for belts and paydays - rec centers and gyms don't offer that.

[just the facts]

If you say so even though what I said was factually right, Id rather you dissect what's left after you take out 17 of his best wins, but I know you wont because it proves that 90% of his resume was Cans.

Again, name one quality contender he didn’t fight. Dumb post.

[Roadblock]

Again, name one quality contender he didn’t fight. Dumb post.

Thats not the argument and was in none of my post, my statement was his resume is 90% Cans, its a fact why you spinning sht that was never said.

Its a warped way of debating when you sing your own narrative that wasnt a part of anything, pure deflection from the facts at hand, prove what I said is wrong or fck off.

[just the facts]

Thats not the argument and was in none of my post, my statement was his resume is 90% Cans, its a fact why you spinning sht that was never said.

It’sa warped way of debating when you sing your own narrative that wasnt a part of anything, pure deflection from the facts at hand, prove what I said is wrong or fck off.

In your original post you said “it’s all about the level of your opponents” and you implied Robinsons resume was less than stellar. If “it’s all about the level of your opponents” and Robinsons resume is shyte, then certainty you can name one contender he didn’t fight during his welterweight and middleweight title reigns. I’ll wait……….

[Roadblock]

In your original post you said “it’s all about the level of your opponents” and you implied Robinsons resume was less than stellar. If “it’s all about the level of your opponents” and Robinsons resume is shyte, then certainty you can name one contender he didn’t fight during his welterweight and middleweight title reigns. I’ll wait……….

Lol you implied lol, there is your spin lol, why not repeat exactly what I said which was SRRs resume is 90% Cans , what is this implication BS , its your BS is what it is, what I said nothing more nothing less is fact so stop trying to cry about what was never said.

Keep going buddy and I will drown you, you are wrong, whatever you apply to what's said is on you, it was you that changed the words in your head, what was said is what was said and its clear and factual.

[Fanofreason]

It couldnt be done. Fighting tomato’s even you would have to fight once a month for 12.5 years to get in the 150 fights. You would be losing money from all the travel to find monthly cards to even fight on.

[Roadblock]

It couldnt be done. Fighting tomato’s even you would have to fight once a month for 12.5 years to get in the 150 fights. You would be losing money from all the travel to find monthly cards to even fight on.

It is fantasy you realize, its a hypothetical question, logically its possible if a few variables are met, in real life its still possible but highly unlikely to ever be done, especially seeing as winning 150 fights is not the single goal, Lomachenko won 396 fights how many fights a year did he have.