Some of these lovely gentleman needs to learn how to pick the winner before placing multipliers cuz ya just reaching
i lost a x3 - you'll find that there's not that many fights in a year where the underdog has a realistic chance of winning - so you have to use those multipliers when you think there's a chance of an upset
Ritson got pummeled by Ponce but I thought he looked decent in his last 2 fights
i lost a x3 - you'll find that there's not that many fights in a year where the underdog has a realistic chance of winning - so you have to use those multipliers when you think there's a chance of an upset
Ritson got pummeled by Ponce but I thought he looked decent in his last 2 fights
Yes that's why we get very few multipliers to work with and they should be used efficiently. But there are tons of fights every year, big and small, where the underdogs have realistic chances of winning.
Multipliers should be used only when one is almost certain 99% sure about the outcome.
For instance in Rey Vargas-Foster, I was so sure that the underdog's style beats the champ so I went all in on Foster X5 here and destroyed the bookies in the process. It was a classic, one shot on kill, kill five birds with a single stone type sht. You know me it's what I do.
That's why MulaKO ran off with his tails behind his legs to hide. I told him that he can continue copying me but he decided to think on his own and it aint looking good lol.
Comment